You’re right. That’s a valid point. It was a tedious conversation that had way too much crypto bullshit and didn’t even compare or comment on how the output might’ve been qualitatively different from ChatGPT.
I’m just used to the hater downvotes and didn’t think further than that to explain them even though I was very annoyed while reading the article myself.
And I always hate if people let LLMs just spread loads of misinformation. In this log they’re talking mainly about facts. And Llama as an LLM just makes up a lot of things that are just wrong. The first few paragraphs are on point. But they’re followed by several pages of misinformation. If you just put that out there without commenting that it’s mainly false, that’s not acceptable. At least that’s why I downvoted it.
You mean the downvotes? There are a lot of AI haters that downvote anything that isn’t tearing them down. Try an AI specific community.
In this case it’s not the haters. They’re there, too. But this is just a long and incoherent chatlog. And it has nothing interesting in it.
You’re right. That’s a valid point. It was a tedious conversation that had way too much crypto bullshit and didn’t even compare or comment on how the output might’ve been qualitatively different from ChatGPT.
I’m just used to the hater downvotes and didn’t think further than that to explain them even though I was very annoyed while reading the article myself.
And I always hate if people let LLMs just spread loads of misinformation. In this log they’re talking mainly about facts. And Llama as an LLM just makes up a lot of things that are just wrong. The first few paragraphs are on point. But they’re followed by several pages of misinformation. If you just put that out there without commenting that it’s mainly false, that’s not acceptable. At least that’s why I downvoted it.