• problematicPanther@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 days ago

    it’s fine to kill all X when X is objectively evil, like Nazis and slavers. They aren’t your friends, they’ll kill you and everyone you love without a second thought. It’s not time to play the nuance game and say “but but but killing is bad!”, yeah it is. it is bad.but the only way to stop fascism is by killing it. y you can’t debate it when the boot’s on your neck.

    • FozzyOsbourne@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 days ago

      I’m assuming the person you’re imagining to be objectively bad is either literally Hitler or a skinhead neonazi with swastika tattoos and a history of violence, right? What about people who joined the Nazi party because the alternative was having their lives destroyed, or the kid with a bad home life who was radicalised by a gang of thugs who are his only friends? They’re both fascists and victims of fascism, where do you draw the line at who should be killed?

      • explodicle@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        5 days ago

        The line being drawn isn’t based on morality, it’s defending yourself and even more innocent people. By the time that radicalized guy has already become a Nazi, it no longer matters why he did it - he’s a danger to everyone, a rabid dog.

        It absolutely sucks to see this happen to someone who used to be a person.