https://academic.oup.com/ije/article/53/6/dyae136/7822310 It’s recent, from 16 October. You should also know that studies are effectively primary sources that have gone through fresh pairs of eyes and reviews are the trustworthy ones, though that also doesn’t necessarily means this one must be untrustowrthy; it just means that time hasn’t told whether it holds.
If your concern was that I didn’t qualify the headline’s area of interest, I just did that. The headline was from the TechCrunch article this link post goes to.
It doesn’t matter if youre copying another (wrong) headline from a sensationalized article. Your post will be removed anyway as it violates the rules of the sub. There’s no reason everyone should know this, nor did you give a reason.
There are plenty other reason besides CVD to use a standing desk.