Joker@sh.itjust.works to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 4 days agoChegg Is On Its Last Legs After ChatGPT Sent Its Stock Down 99%gizmodo.comexternal-linkmessage-square35fedilinkarrow-up11arrow-down10
arrow-up11arrow-down1external-linkChegg Is On Its Last Legs After ChatGPT Sent Its Stock Down 99%gizmodo.comJoker@sh.itjust.works to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 4 days agomessage-square35fedilink
minus-squareanomnom@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·4 days agoIt really seems like they could quote sources. But if they did that it’d be way easier to detect the plagiarism and they’d be liable for tons of copyright infringement. I have no proof of this, just a hunch/consiracy.
minus-squarewizardbeard@lemmy.dbzer0.comlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·4 days agoSome supposedly do, and then have been found hallucinating non-existent ones.
minus-squareTimLovesTech (AuDHD)(he/him)@badatbeing.sociallinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·3 days agoYep, AI has been shown to create sources (books/websites/etc.) names out of just pieces of the question asked and do it with the confidence that it’s real.
It really seems like they could quote sources.
But if they did that it’d be way easier to detect the plagiarism and they’d be liable for tons of copyright infringement.
I have no proof of this, just a hunch/consiracy.
Some supposedly do, and then have been found hallucinating non-existent ones.
Yep, AI has been shown to create sources (books/websites/etc.) names out of just pieces of the question asked and do it with the confidence that it’s real.