• OpenStars@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    9 days ago

    Exactly - it’s like how Boomers claim to be the only ones with knowledge (“just do what we tell you, you stupid kids!”), as they hand nations (USA, UK, Germany upcoming, Brazil, and most every other nation on earth as well) over to totalitarian regimes. We used to fight the Nazis… now their kids have become them, or rather set their children upon the path to fairly soon become thus. So now I don’t know what to believe.

    Though if women are females, and females are women, then if both were true, then why couldn’t either word fill in for one another - what am I missing here?

    • Dragon Rider (drag)@lemmy.nz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      9 days ago

      Though if women are females, and females are women,

      But neither of those is true. Some “females” identify as men, and some “non-females” identify as women.

      Also, think about the difference in the meaning of the words. One is an identity. One is biology; physical machinery. You know when corporations refer to people as “consumers”? It’s gross, right? Reducing complex three dimensional people to an economic function. Reducing people to a biological function is also gross.