Asking as someone from the other side of the planet.

From the things I saw about the US election, the Dems were the side with plans for the economy - minimum wage adjustments, unions, taxing the rich, etc. The Republicans didn’t seem to have any concrete plans. At least, this is what I saw.

I don’t doubt Bernie Sanders though - he seems like a straight truth teller. But what am I missing?

  • B1naryB0t@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    Harris needed to get progressives and instead they put their efforts into winning over moderate conservatives. Even if she didn’t make concessions, putting time and effort into promoting that meant she didn’t have time or effort to put into the progressive voter base

    • Yondoza@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      Building a broad coalition without policy concessions was a waste of time? You’re going to have a tough time convincing me of that point.

      • Claidheamh@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 month ago

        I don’t think he needs to convince you of that. The results of your election are plain for all to see.

      • Andy@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 month ago

        What broad coalition?

        There was no coalition. It was a campaign by and for white college educated professional women in the suburbs.

        That’s not a coalition, that’s a book club.

      • Black616Angel@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 month ago

        Look at the numbers please:
        In 2020 Biden had 81,284,666 votes.
        In 2024 Kamala had 69,218,912 votes.

        That is a difference of around 12 Million votes or nearly 15%. Trump at the same time gained only like 750k votes. I mean yes, he somehow GAINED votes, but still…

        What is your supposed reason for those numbers?