And I’m being serious. I feel like there might be an argument there, I just don’t understand it. Can someone please “steelman” that argument for me?
And I’m being serious. I feel like there might be an argument there, I just don’t understand it. Can someone please “steelman” that argument for me?
It doesn’t have to make sense for people to convince themselves to do it. It will certainly lead to worse outcomes for gaza
If yoor morals disregard the probable outcomes and is more focused on normative rules you could make some arguments but that kind of purity won’t save a single starving child in gaza
Maybe people believe that it will save a starving child in the future. Like, some future where politicians finally listen to them?