• rez@lemmy.mlOP
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    9 days ago

    Eh, it could help discern trolls (like when a user has -6900 Karma, you know they have dogshit takes) and could inspire actually insightful commentary (since it’s usually the more ingenious comments that get upvotes). But on the other hand, there are definitely some big cons to having a Karma-like system.

    • Ada@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      9 days ago

      Many years ago on reddit, you could get given gold. It gave you paid benefits. My comments earned me literally years worth of gold, and my karma was similarly increasing.

      Then I came out as trans. Suddenly the gold stopped and my karma stagnated

      That kind of bias is built in to the karma system. It doesn’t just punish shit takes, it also sidelines visible minorities

    • Swordgeek@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      9 days ago

      Honestly, a person’s actual post history should be more relevant and indicative to whether they’renworth engaging with tham a single number.

      Furthermore, aside from deliberate trolls, most comments or posts should be assessed on their own merits, irrespective of the poster’s history.

      People are complex, and it’s possible that raving political idiots might have thoughtful opinions on their favourite video game or the aspects that make a perfect butt.