This is ridiclous

  • Mad_Punda@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    18 days ago

    I read someone else musing that they must have thought that keeping it plugged in all the time would be bad, so the made it impossible to use the mouse while plugged in. Seems plausible. I suppose it would degrade the battery? Or the cord drag would be bad?

    • jj4211@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      18 days ago

      On the battery, they should have been able to do whatever they thought best in the battery management system, in that case.

      Simple answer is easiest, that they are obsessed with the “clean” minimalist look and want to abolish every visible port and buttin they can.

      Surprised though that the mouse didn’t do the magsafe thing.

    • deadcade@lemmy.deadca.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      18 days ago

      “But it looks bad and could be bad for the battery!”

      Every other wireless mouse has it in the front, Apple has no valid reason to leave it at the bottom.

      • Echo Dot@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        18 days ago

        The fact that everyone hasn’t taken on this design trend just shows how stupid it is.

        • Honytawk@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          18 days ago

          They also take on stupid design trends, like removing the headphone jack.

          This one is just several degrees more stupid.

    • TonyTonyChopper@mander.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      18 days ago

      The design forces the user to use it wirelessly. Apple just wants their products to look better, meaning NO CORDS EVER. It’s entirely about aesthetic.

          • Duamerthrax@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            18 days ago

            Apparently Logitech does have this out now, so I wonder if they patented the “concept” and it will be another 20 years before anyone can do it. Assuming that someone else didn’t already do it 20 years ago and that patented already ran out.

            • TwanHE@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              18 days ago

              Ive seen one at least 10 years ago already. But that didn’t exactly charge the mouse, instead the mouse relied on always being on the pad to work.

              • Anivia@feddit.org
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                edit-2
                18 days ago

                That’s not true. It charges very slowly, about 12 hours to charge a completely dead battery, but it does charge

                The bigger problem is that it’s expensive af, and since current gen Logitech mice have months of battery life and charge in an hour with the usb cord it’s really pointless.

      • DJDarren@thelemmy.club
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        18 days ago

        It’s literally just the same body as the OG Magic Mouse, which had a bay for a pair of AAs underneath. All they did was remove the bay, put a rechargeable battery in there, and a socket to charge it. It takes a couple of minutes to give it 9 hours of juice.

        There’s no grand conspiracy.

      • WolfLink@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        18 days ago

        Their trackpad can and does work via USB so ???

        I have one of their trackpads and it works great with Ubuntu over USB but not over Bluetooth for some reason. (It connects, but Ubuntu doesn’t handle it well.)