• Ugurcan@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    11 days ago

    Oops, yes. I definitely would expect these to be much louder than your 6 GB 1998 model HDD wrangling under stress of copying files at 30 MB/s.

    • Onsotumenh@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      11 days ago

      Tell that to my IBM 10GB 10.000 RPM U2W SCSI from back then. To this day I have never witnessed a noisier harddrive… But that PC was pretty epic, including the biggest mf of a mainboard I ever had (the SCSI controller was onboard).

      • varyingExpertise@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        11 days ago

        Ah, the sound of turning on the SCSI storage tower.

        KA-TSCHONK. WeeeeeeeeEEEEEIIIIIII… skrrrt, skrrrt, clack.

        Either that or KA-TSCHONK, silence, if there were already too many boxes on that circuit at a lan party 😁

    • MonkderVierte@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      11 days ago

      Your everyday modern HDD does not much more than 60MB/s after the on-disk cache (a few GB) is full.

      • DaPorkchop_@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        10 days ago

        not sure what you’re on about, i have some cheap 500GB USB 3 drives from like 2016 lying around and even those can happily deal with sustained writes over 130MB/s.

        • frezik@midwest.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          10 days ago

          When the cache isn’t full, yes, that’s true. Copy a file that’s significantly bigger than cache and performance will drop part way through.