nuclear power produces long-lived radioactive waste, which needs to be stored securely. Nuclear fuels, such as the element uranium (which needs to be mined), are finite, so the technology is not considered renewable. Renewable sources of energy, such as solar and wind power suffer from “intermittency”, meaning they do not consistently produce energy at all hours of the day.

fusion technologies have yet to produce sustained net energy output (more energy than is put in to run the reactor), let alone produce energy at the scale required to meet the growing demands of AI. Fusion will require many more technological developments before it can fulfil its promise of delivering power to the grid.

  • IchNichtenLichten@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    6 hours ago

    This you?

    We do not currently have the battery tech to have a fully renewables-powered grid where batteries are used for the regular dips in production wind and solar have.

    We likely won’t have infrastructure like that in place for decades.

    Put up or shut up.

    • TheGrandNagus@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 hours ago

      Right, and I replied to a comment where you claimed we can just use batteries to replace everything but renewables.

      Put up or shut up. Where’s the data?

      • IchNichtenLichten@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 hours ago

        No, I said this

        If only we had some way of storing energy for use later. Oh well.

        Not this, as you claim

        Right, and I replied to a comment where you claimed we can just use batteries to replace everything but renewables.

        Why are you making stuff up?