• Magister@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    1 month ago

    Yes, there is laws, IANA says that ideally in 3-5 years all the .io will be gone, like the .yu ones, they do not exist anymore.

    • coolmojo@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      The .su domain is still active and the Soviet Union does not exist for more than 30 years now.

    • jj4211@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      I doubt it. The cited precedent of .yu didn’t have a ton of big international commercial interest, but .io does.

      They will absolutely find a rationale to change what io means when ISO retires io. The “laws” will be tweaked, ignored, or loopholed around.

    • AA5B@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      1 month ago

      Some amount of organization is a good thing for many reasons. Think of an analogy to roads where basic traffic rules allow everyone the freedom to travel wherever and however but subject to the rules of locales. Feel free to pick your own domain within any generally recognized top level domain, according to the rules established by that tld.

      In particular, two character top level domains are reserved for ownership by specific countries. They get to say who can have a presence there, under what standards, and they deserve any profit made from that. This was a way of giving everyone a voice, to expand it beyond the us, to give many interests their own home

    • Encrypt-Keeper@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      They do, that’s why this is an issue in the first place. The purpose of ccTLDs is to host domains associated with a particular country. If the country stops existing, there’s no reason to use that country’s ccTLD. The problem is they let anyone register domains under this ccTLD even if they have no association with that country, hence the situation we’re in.

      • Echo Dot@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 month ago

        Actually I believe you had to be a British national to register. Well at least you’re supposed to be a British national I’m not sure how much they checked.

    • JohnEdwa@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      1 month ago

      Because .io is the top level country code domain for the British Indian Ocean Territory, and once a country ceases to exist, the top level domain is supposed to be phased out according to the IANA rules and eventually discontinued by the ICANN.
      There are no .yu, .dd, .cs, or .tp domains left. The only exception I know is .su (soviet union).

        • Nougat@fedia.io
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 month ago

          The only reason .su still exists is because Russia said they would decommission it and then never did. ICANN chose not to let that happen again, which explains their choice to decommission the later ones.

          • WhatAmLemmy@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            edit-2
            1 month ago

            What the fuck is the point of decommissioning them entirely, though? What value does that do anybody? Is there another country waiting in the wings? There are 1500 TLD’s already.

            The obvious non-dickhead solution would be to transition the mgmt of .io from a ccTLD to a gTLD. “Rules” is not an answer.

            • FaceDeer@fedia.io
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              1 month ago

              Yeah, the whole concept of “national” TLDs is proving to be a rather poor one in practice. Very few of them actually make sense in the way they’re used.

              • sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                1 month ago

                That sounds more like an issue of enforcement than anything. If anyone can register a domain with your country’s extension, it’s not really your country’s extension.

                If we handled it properly, those domains would have value.

                • WhatAmLemmy@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  1 month ago

                  Yes, but when management fails the impact should not be imposed on the subordinates for following the process; it should be entirely on management.

                  In practice, this would mean creating a more stringent DNS approach to ccTLD’s that does not impact existing domains until if/when they choose to adopt it. Ultimately it just shows ICANN’s inadequacy &/or incompetence, which I guarantee has more to do with it’s management than it’s engineers/workers.

        • JohnEdwa@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          1 month ago

          Maybe. But it’s up to ICANN and their rules, money might not be relevant to them, and with .io, there literally isn’t a single person or company that uses it “correctly” as country TLDs are primarily intended to be used by entities connected to that country, and the territory has no permanent residents, unlike with .su.
          On the flip side, that might work for the case too as well - maybe ICANN decides to make it a generic TLD, like .com or .org instead as it’s not really directly connected to a country?
          We shall see.

            • JohnEdwa@sopuli.xyz
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              edit-2
              1 month ago

              Why would how much money Mauritius might or might not make be any relevance to ICANN, a US non-profit?

          • 0x0@programming.dev
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 month ago

            as country TLDs are primarily intended to be used by entities connected to that country

            Primarily, sure, but quite a few of them get abused, check the notes column. A glaring one these days is .ai, as are youtu.be and, of course, goatse.cx.

            • Billiam@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              1 month ago

              Tuvalu make around $10 million a year- about one-sixth of their gdp- from licensing .tv.

          • m-p{3}@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 month ago

            So they could just transform .io to a gTLD without causing any downtime.

              • SkaveRat@discuss.tchncs.de
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                1 month ago

                luckily those are their internal rules and now international laws that can’t be broken.

                THere’s literally 0 reason they can’t just go “well, this tld is too big. it’s generic now”

                • anamethatisnt@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  1 month ago

                  The profits gained from sales of .io domains has come under increasing scrutiny given that the UK’s control over the archipelago itself is under threat.
                  Chagossian refugee groups (former inhabitants forcibly removed in the 1960s and 1970s) petitioning the UK government for the right of return have recently extended their grievances to the return of the .io domain as well (Chagos Refugees Group United Kingdom et al. vs. Internet Computer Bureau Limited Citation 2021).
                  Additionally, Mauritius is also attempting to gain control over .io by petitioning IANA for redelegation (Bowcott Citation 2022).
                  However, while these groups fight for control over the .io domain, a recent UN ruling challenging British sovereignty over the island threatens the existence of the ccTLD itself.

                  https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/23738871.2023.2238723

                  While I agree with you in that ICANN will probably save .io through some policy change it isn’t as easy as just saying “screw all our policies, this ccTLD is now a gTLD.” considering the fighting going on regarding it.

      • DarkThoughts@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 month ago

        There’s plenty of non country domains too. Just make it into some acronym or have it mean I/O or whatever.

      • Dasnap@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 month ago

        “They have to get rid of it unless they decide not to.”

        I assume it’s just gonna be inherited by Mauritius.

  • guy@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    Really not looking forward to the idea of github.io links all becoming dead. So many repos with documentation at a github.io URL, with those links spread all across plaintext files and Stack Overflow and forums

    • AA5B@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      1 month ago

      The article said companies profit from it, so their prediction is no. It’s just an opinion, and not supported by any legal or diplomatic action in the article.

      My opinion is it should cease to exist. Two letter domains are country codes and IANA policy is it should match a list maintained by the UN. IANA has no business deciding for itself and has said it doesn’t want to, and they’re opening themselves to all sorts of liability and complications should they stray from that. If the UN no longer says its a valid country, it needs to no longer be a country code domain, and that’s too bad for any companies speculating on its future

    • ramble81@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      One of our spinoff companies wants to act so badly like a start up and be edgy they moved everything to a .io domain. This would be icing on the cake for how cowboy they manage everything.

  • Tiger Jerusalem@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    Jesus Christ this will be a major pain in the ass if it goes through… I’m really not in the mood of having to reconfigure all my self hosted services to a new domain.

    • gencha@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      Do it anyway. Having anything behind a TLD that is tied to the political control of a tiny geographic area is insanely careless

      • Tiger Jerusalem@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        1 month ago

        Maybe, but I had no idea this was tied to a country. I thought it was a novelty tld, like xyz and art. You know, like input/output so io.

        • gencha@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 month ago

          Yeah, I’ve been with you. I owned a couple .so from Somalia for a while. They cranked up the cost to $$$ and I had to cancel it. I’m not a smartass, I just burned myself already in the past

        • skulblaka@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 month ago

          That assumption is exactly why tons of techbros jumped on it. But no, it’s for the British Indian Ocean Territory. Roughly 23 square miles of islands all within pissing distance of each other south of India.

  • hamsterkill@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    I’m surprised it’s not mentioned in the article, but also complicating this situation is the Chagos refugees seeking to take control of the TLD and/or receive reparations from the current registrar.