• RightHandOfIkaros@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    25 days ago

    They couldn’t even pay me to play Concord.

    I hope this is like Morbius, and comes back only to another monumental flop. This game is already so far in the hole at $400 million I dont see how them spending more money on it to develop it more will ever make a profit. They would have to put the most egregious loot box gacha monetization ever known to man to even try, there is no chance it ever makes money.

    • Jackthelad@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      25 days ago

      The $400 million line shows how far some random guy’s unverified opinion can go.

      It absolutely didn’t cost more than GTA 5.

      • ampersandrew@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        25 days ago

        $400M has been refuted by several sources at this point, but there are lots of ways to have spent more than GTA V given that it was developed in a very different era than Concord was. The first handful of Halo games, including those on 360, were some of the biggest games of their day, and they’d all be considered quite cheap by today’s standards.

      • RightHandOfIkaros@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        25 days ago

        $400M, $200M, whatever. Sony lost a crap ton of money. They had to pay staff for a game that was in development for 8 years and they had close to 1000 people on payroll for it at one point.

        It definitely cost more than GTA V. I mean, Genshin Impact has a dev cost of over ~$700M and that game was in development for only 3 years, and has been actively developed after release for 4 years. Thats ~$100M per year. Cyberpunk 2077 began development in 2013 and when it released 7 years later in 2020 had a development cost of ~$350M. Concord being in development for 8 years and costing less than $400M would almost be absurd.

        • Jackthelad@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          24 days ago

          Another falsehood being repeated is that it was in development for 8 years. It wasn’t. 8 years ago it was an idea.

          The actual development is around 4 years.

    • arefx@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      25 days ago

      I couldn’t imagine getting into this game when valve is working on Deadlock and is basically available for free already to anyone.

    • kinkles@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      25 days ago

      I’m very curious to know how many people in this thread disparaging the game have actually played it.

      • Jackthelad@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        25 days ago

        Given that sales were only 25,000, statistically it’s probably none of them.

        I like how I got three downvotes just for saying I liked a game. 😂

        • style99@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          25 days ago

          You get downvoted for truth. That happened to me all the time on Reddit, at least.

          • PushButton@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            24 days ago

            I take down votes like a small win. Most people are going to down vote if you are rocking their boat by shattering their little illusory world.

  • PunchingWood@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    25 days ago

    They gotta stop trying and just let it die already. No need in trying to salvage anything out of it.

    Like the article states it already failed to garner a reasonable crowd in the beta, and even less as a paid game.

    It was just a bad game, plagued by terrible development. It has cost enough already, why would they even bother investing anything more in it, take the loss and just move on and make something actually fun and creative.

  • rebelsimile@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    25 days ago

    If Concord’s launch was a rocket, it would have bored a hole into the launch pad because the thrusters were backward, and I don’t think anyone would have called it a “launch” in any conventional sense.

    So how can it be a comeback if it never even came?

  • zecg@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    25 days ago

    buy this mysterious thing I have wrapped in some comic book pages

    wtf it’s shit, refund me

    take for free this mysterious thing I have wrapped in some comic book pages. No one knows what it could be, but you can pay to make it stink less

  • Solemarc@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    24 days ago

    Ahh! Of course! The problem with Concord was the price! That’s why no one cared during its free beta weekend!