• SeattleRain@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 months ago

    Filing you in public is not a violation of your privacy especially in a limited scope like a single club. That’s not at all equivalent to saying I should be able to read your emails.

    Public safety needs to be weighed against civil rights. I don’t think women should be drugged because of a extreme fundamentalist a paranoid interpretation of privacy rights.

    Also people want to club where it’s happening. Even if a club has a lot of people they could still not be dancing.

    • jvw@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      Public safety needs to be weighed against civil rights

      Oooo a tankie!

      . I don’t think women should be drugged because of a extreme fundamentalist a paranoid interpretation of privacy rights.

      Oooo a straw man reducto ad absurdum argument!

      Blocked. Buhbye🤖

      • SeattleRain@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        3 months ago

        I’m not a tankie. And clubs already do their own closed circuit TV surveillance. And no my argument is not reducto ad absurdum. There is a growing and pervasive problem with drugging drinks in American bars. I only brought it up as a side benefit anyway. I’d really like the convenience of seeing how hot a bar is instead of having to pay to get in only to see that it’s lame and leave.

        • ruse8145@lemmy.sdf.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          3 months ago

          You strike me as a very youthful cop tbh, full of weird ideas of how the world works and with righteous belief that you are right and anyone who has a different pov is wrong… But that’s just based on this thread.