• Kelly@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    3 months ago

    Without knowing anything of your history this question looks like its asked in bad faith.

    If the question is legit then type “sealioning” into a search engine and read a few of the results.

    Then with that knowledge reread the rules and they should be pretty clear.

    • ColeSloth@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      Meh. I mean the / is “no stupid questions”. 98% of everything posted in the sub could be found elsewhere by using search engines. I’ve never even heard the term “sealioning” before now, but if you just tell people to “Google it” this instance may as well not exist.

  • southsamurai@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 months ago

    Ahhh, I don’t know about sea lioning, I’ve never seen you doing it.

    That’s where you have someone “just asking questions”, and pretending not to know anything about the matter, while they’re pushing an agenda.

    You’d have to ask a mod if that’s the part of rule 5 they’re dinging you for, but if you’ve been doing it, the comments are getting removed before I’ve seen them.

    The other part of rule 5 is rage baiting, where you post something inflammatory just to get people riled up. Again, not something I’ve seen guy actually do, but I can understand how someone might read some posts that way.

    We’ve interacted a decent amount over the last few months, and you do have a different way of presenting questions, and a different way of thinking, I wouldn’t interpret your posts or comments as trolling. You’re consistent, you engage in a friendly manner, and don’t go over the top when someone gives you a little grief. But, again, I may not be seeing everything.

    My advice? Avoid politics entirely. Unless I miss my guess, that’s where you’re running into issues.

    • Boozilla@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      Similar observations here. I certainly haven’t seen everything, but what I have seen matches your description. I appreciate OP creating much-needed content.

      • southsamurai@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        3 months ago

        Yeah, Don comes up with some really interesting stuff. To the point that even if I can’t provide a response, I’m happy to see their name.

    • EABOD25@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      You made a friend, OP. That honestly says a lot about your character

  • xmunk@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    3 months ago

    Rule 5- No baiting or sealioning or promoting an agenda.

    Questions which, instead of being of an innocuous nature, are specifically intended (based on reports and in the opinion of our crack moderation team) to bait users into ideological wars on charged political topics will be removed and the authors warned - or banned - depending on severity.

    Asking someone to explain Sealioning is Sealioning and bait - in case you’re legitimately ignorant here’s Wikipedia: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sealioning

  • Kintarian@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 months ago

    I have not heard of sea lioning either. I learn something new every day. I wonder how sea lions got associated with trolling. I’m going to have to look up the etymology of that; it’s an interesting phrase.

  • NeoNachtwaechter@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 months ago

    keep getting dinged for not following rule 5

    In that case it is better to ban you, because then you get a chance to learn your proper googeling yourself, instead of trying to ask other people for the simplest things.