“Fidelity is currently valuing X at about $9.4 billion”

I found this funny.

  • scarabic@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    I mean the people at Twitter were very happy to sell it off. Remember how they actually sued to force him to go through with the deal and succeeded in stopping him from backing out?

    Even if he’d managed it as well as the prior stewards, it was always a losing business.

    • JackbyDev@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      If the price offered is actually a good price then I think they might have some obligation to shareholders to pursue it. (Many of the people making that decision likely also being shareholders.) Like if someone offered you more than what your stuff is worth but tried to changed their mind, wouldn’t you pursue that? I don’t think that’s any sort of indicator that they thought it was a sinking ship. It’s just in their best interest to take a good deal when they get one.

      • scarabic@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        I think you make a good point. But we don’t have to guess whether they thought Twitter was struggling. We know it was.

        Twitter never managed to develop an online ad business that matched the scale of its influence in popular culture and society at large. Twitter has lost money in six of the eight years since its IPO.

        Source: CNBC

        • JackbyDev@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 months ago

          My point is that if someone offers you a good price for what you believe you have have, you take it. If they thought it was good and they got a good price for it they’d take it. If they thought it was bad and they got a good price for it they’d take it.