• aggelalex@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 months ago

    Believe it or not, there are shapes for which this isn’t possible, like most letters of the Latin alphabet

    • tourist@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      I’m confused

      Surely if you can make something smaller, you could make it fit inside anything bigger than it?

      Or do I not have the assumptions down?

      Do the lines count as “borders”?

      So Like Q,R,O,A etc. have “holes” but Z, X, I, L etc are just lines with no enclosure

      That would make sense

      I thought maybe the rules were if you spray paint a huge L on the wall you could draw a little L on it with chalk when it dries

      Sorry , just thinking out loud

      • Mirodir@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 months ago

        Assuming we shrink all spacial dimensions equally: With Z, the diagonal will also shrink so that the two horizontal lines would be closer together and then you could not fit them into the original horizontal lines anymore. Only once you shrink the Z far enough that it would fit within the line-width could you fit it into itself again. X I and L all work at any arbitrary amount of shrinking though.

      • aggelalex@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 months ago

        Only if the letters have thickness. If they are just 2 dimensional lines (which is the minimal information to construct a letter), you’ll have to shrink it to infinity into a single point.

  • Buddahriffic@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 months ago

    Another fun fact: the pictured orientation of that smaller version of Africa is the only one that you can use to produce that picture.