fossilesque@mander.xyzM to Science Memes@mander.xyzEnglish · 1 year agoLinguisticsmander.xyzimagemessage-square262linkfedilinkarrow-up11.4Karrow-down159
arrow-up11.35Karrow-down1imageLinguisticsmander.xyzfossilesque@mander.xyzM to Science Memes@mander.xyzEnglish · 1 year agomessage-square262linkfedilink
minus-squarevonxylofon@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3·1 year agoActually, by its original definition, the word “cromulent” is not cromulent.
minus-squareTlaloc_Temporal@lemmy.calinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·1 year agoOnly when it was coined. It’s very cromulent now, and could be argued to have become cromulent as soon as the meta argument was understood: that good words are those that successfully convey meaning.
Actually, by its original definition, the word “cromulent” is not cromulent.
Only when it was coined. It’s very cromulent now, and could be argued to have become cromulent as soon as the meta argument was understood: that good words are those that successfully convey meaning.