• RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 months ago

    I thought the title said “We are wasting up to 20% of our time on computers.”

    My immediate thought was “That seems way too low…”

  • CrowAirbrush@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 months ago

    How about everyone who has zero skills with these problems, do they count is 0% spent on them as they outsource it or do they count as 100% since the smallest problem incapacitates their computer usage?

  • Zip2@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 months ago

    Sounds more like a lot of people could do with some basic computer skills training.

  • bstix@feddit.dk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 months ago

    I recognise the waste in waiting time, but I also think we are still increasing productivity more than enough to make up for it.

    Personally I solve it by multitasking harder. Whenever there is a waiting time for a download or other stuff I simply start doing something else. I’m not going to waste my life watching loading bars for a living.

    I don’t think increasing user-friendlyness is a good solution. It’s pretty much what caused the issues to begin with. Every time Windows or the apps make something more user-friendly it always results in more buttons to click and more updates to keep up.

    I also spend an unreasonable amount of time just rearranging the windows in comparison to back when apps had keyboard-only GUIs with functions layered in different pages or tabs. I obviously don’t think that is a good solution today either, but it goes to show that the bloated operating system has a lot of the blame.

    Say you want to do something simple like renaming a file, you’ll need to open an app to show the folders and files and also 100 different functions that are of no use for the specific task, position and scroll it where it’s visible, navigate by mouse or keyboard and then do whatever you wanted. My point is that just operating the operation system is something that requires 10s of seconds over and over again every day. There’s a long way from thought to execution for the simplest task.

    The good thing is that it enables a lot of people to do so without any training at all, so maybe that makes up for it in total.

  • Nougat@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 months ago

    How much time do we waste on car problems? Neighbor problems? Political problems? Grocery problems?

    • MIDItheKID@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      Also in the context of working, this isn’t just computers. It’s tools in general, and a computer is a type of tool. Problems with your saw? Problems with your batteries? Problems with access to electricity and your extension cords not being long enough? Problem with losing your 10mm sockets? If you’re a trucker or driver the problem could be your vehicle. Etc etc etc.

      This article is stupid. Tools break, they always have and always will. The tools we have now are better than they have ever been. They will probably keep getting more and more efficient, but they will still break. Because tools break.

    • akilou@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      Right and how much time do we save by having computers? Fixing the problems is just the cost of doing business

    • Cocodapuf@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      Yeah, this seems like a pretty dumb conclusion. I expect that as far back as you look, people always took advantage of tools that save them time. But then they always also spent a fair amount of that time (that they could have been working), just maintaining/fixing/making their tools. I think the truth is that computers are very useful tools, but the maintenance and troubleshooting can be quite time consuming.

      I will continue using computers though.

      • Nougat@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 months ago

        Using computers and also having to deal with their problems is still far more betterer than not using computers at all.

  • elrik@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 months ago

    “Up to 20%” is meaningless for a headline and is pure click bait. It could be any number between 0% and 20%. Or put another way, any number from no time at all to a horrifying more than an entire day per week.

    Why not just state the average from what is probably a statistically irrelevant study and move on?

  • oo1@lemmings.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 months ago

    53% of my time is spent looking for CASE statements without an END. This is 99% human error - does that count?