• calabast@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    I really like the safety aspect of this, but 72% capacity after 300 cycles seems low. What’s a use case scenario where this is preferable over lipo batteries?

    • TerkErJerbs@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      Boats, planes, drones, phones, bikes… Anywhere that you can maximize storage cell capacity in odd shaped volumes and spaces/designs. It’s great.

    • orrk@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      Having looked at comparative data, it’s not really out of the norm…

    • Ilovethebomb@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      Much more stable chemistry. In stationary applications, like UPS systems and off grid electrical systems, lead acid is still the standard, due to having stable chemistry, very unlikely to catch fire, and a cost to capacity ratio that is still very good.

      The degradation seems pretty bad, but if it’s stable from 300 cycles onwards, you could take 75% as the actual capacity of the battery.