• chonglibloodsport@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        3 months ago

        No, in our current best-supported model of the universe (Lambda-CDM) the concept of “before” the Big Bang is meaningless. It is the apex of the spacetime “bell” from which everything emerged.

        • rimjob_rainer@discuss.tchncs.de
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          3 months ago

          But something must have triggered the big bang. The model might not support this, but this only means the model is insufficient to describe what goes beyond our known universe.

          • WhatTrees@lemmy.blahaj.zone
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            3 months ago

            But something must have triggered the big bang.

            That’s a separate claim you’d have to prove. We have no evidence of something triggering it, we don’t even know that it would need to be triggered. All of our observations occur inside this universe, therefore we have no idea at all if cause-and-effect even applies to the universe as a whole. The short answer is: we don’t know and have no reason to posit the need for something else.

            What does it mean for something to be “beyond” everywhere or before time?

        • interdimensionalmeme@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          3 months ago

          It is incoherent that sonething could suddenly exist out of nothingness.

          Clearly the universe does not exist, this is all an elaborate statistical artifact.