$700, and the side by sides look barely different, from my perspective. The chat seemed to have the same opinion.

    • PunchingWood@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      Depending on how much you care about visuals, yeah.

      A decent GPU will often be the price of an entire console. That said, even if you go with high-end hardware I found that eventually the cost will make up for itself for not having to pay for PSN to make use of and play on the internet. Or the fact that games are very often priced up to 50% more on the PS store than those on PC because there are no competing stores.

    • where_am_i@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      You absolutely will not get anything that runs even remotely decently with ray tracing on in any recent title.

      For the fair comparison you’re only allowed to buy new, not used parts. So, for 700$ you won’t even be able to put together a decent system with a 3070 in it.

      “Oh but i don’t care about ray tracing” – nice copium.

      • burgersc12@mander.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        2 months ago

        I got a cheaper AMD GPU specifically because I do not give a fuck about ray tracing. Also just look at the steamdeck, you can get great performance for very cheap nowadays. It might not be as powerful or nice as a PS5 Pro, but the $700 computer has many advantages in its favor

    • NOT_RICK@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      Which could play MS and Sony games. I don’t think consoles make much sense nowadays.

      • burgersc12@mander.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        And the best part is you don’t have to pay for online and you won’t need to rebuy your games each new console generation.

        • NOT_RICK@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 months ago

          First one I’ll grant you, but there was no rebuying from last gen to current gen for anything non-Nintendo.

          • burgersc12@mander.xyz
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            edit-2
            2 months ago

            If you pay for the discs, you can’t use the discs on future generations. Right? Ps4 can’t read ps3 or ps2 discs. Xbox one can read xbox and 360 discs, but they limit it to only specific games. So in general, you have to buy it once again on their online store, if its available at all.

            • sigmaklimgrindset@sopuli.xyz
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              2 months ago

              Yeah, idk why Ps4 has no backwards compatibility. PS3 (fat) was backwards compatible with PS 1+2, and PS5 is backwards compatible for PS4. I didn’t buy a PS4 for that exact reason, and was lucky enough to get my hands on a PS5 during launch to play all the PS4 games I missed.

              With all the niche Japanese games I like slowly coming to PC, I probably won’t buy a new console ever again. (As an aside, if anyone has a spare fat PS3 they’re willing to sell for parts…)

              • bigmclargehuge@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                2 months ago

                The PS3 fat could only read PS2 disks because it had stripped down PS2 hardware included. It was effectively a PS2/3 combined. This was part of what drove the cost up, so they gutted that hardware from the slim.

                PS4s can’t read PS3 disks because the PS3 used a bespoke PowerPC based chipset that was a colossal pain in the ass to develop for. So for the PS4 to have backwards compatibility, they would have had to either A, include PS3 hardware in the PS4 (expensive) or B, create an efficient software translation layer/built in emulator (see “pain in the ass”).

                From what I have heard, they smartened up with the PS5. It’s basically just a faster PS4. At it’s core, it’s based on very similar hardware, so it’s easy to make PS4 games run without issue, but the boost in performance allows games designed specifically to take advantage of it.

              • burgersc12@mander.xyz
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                2 months ago

                It just feels so anti-consumer and everyones forgets about it and they just happily pay for content which can no longer be owned only rented.

                • sigmaklimgrindset@sopuli.xyz
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  2 months ago

                  I agree. One of the few reasons I still stuck to consoles is because I could buy the physical games and have it on my shelf forever. That’s going the way of the dinosaurs, and while I love that things are more accessible via Steam or whatever, I can’t let my friends borrow my games, or pass it along to someone else to enjoy if I didn’t like a game as much.

                  I also just love collecting and displaying game cases and steelbooks and stuff. That’s rarely a thing anymore, either.

              • wiccan2@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                2 months ago

                The lack of backwards comparability is because of the large difference in architecture.

                The PS2 was a128 bit custom processor, the PS3 had PS2 hardware in the original fat versions to achieve backwards compatibility, it was dropped to reduce the price.

                The PS3 was a 64 bit (I think) custom PowerPC processor.

                With the PS4 Sony switched to x86_64 processors making the console essentially a PC with bespoke custom hardware. The PS5 is the same but better speced components as the tech moved on. That’s why the PS4 & 5 are compatible, they are essentially using the same architecture.

                Microsoft is a similar story but they went all in on emulation of their old consoles which is why only certain games are allowed, they only allow the ones tested to work with the emulator.

                • sigmaklimgrindset@sopuli.xyz
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  2 months ago

                  The PS3 was a 64 bit (I think) custom PowerPC processor.

                  Thanks for jogging my memory, I completely forgot how different the PS3 architecture is compared to the other PlayStations and also the 360. Same reason why emulation for it is so hard (and why MGS4 has no modern ports 🥲)

            • 60fpsrefugee@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              2 months ago

              While pc can play old games, you can sometimes run into compatibility issues. Especially games in the ps1/2/3 era.

              Og Xbox and xbox 360 games work without much issues on Xbox one and series XS. Ps4 and Xbox one games are 99% playable on Series XS and Ps5.

      • HeyJoe@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        It did when the ps5 first came out. $500 for it was a steal back then. I wanted to build a PC at the time but due to the crazy GPU prices and low stock for other parts I decided it was best to wait. Got a ps5 instead (was also hard to get as well) and thought it was absolutely worth the price for the experience it offered. Just built the pc I wanted last fall shortly after prices started dropping. First time ever I made a good choice.

        • anivia@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 months ago

          Even at the time it came out you could have built a pc with an RTX 3060 for that price, which would outperform the PS5 by a big margin and have a way bigger game library

        • Ashtear@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 months ago

          Yeah, after that time I really didn’t think consoles would be as much as a midrange PC. And yet, here we are. Feels like Sony’s back to late PS2 era levels of hubris now.