Gormadt@lemmy.blahaj.zone to Traditional Art@lemmy.worldEnglish · 4 months agoThe Morning Visitor by Dino Buzzati (1967)blog.mirrorofzen.comimagemessage-square55fedilinkarrow-up19arrow-down10
arrow-up19arrow-down1imageThe Morning Visitor by Dino Buzzati (1967)blog.mirrorofzen.comGormadt@lemmy.blahaj.zone to Traditional Art@lemmy.worldEnglish · 4 months agomessage-square55fedilink
minus-squareapfelwoiSchoppen@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·edit-24 months agoIt is about rape, so yeah. The telling of trauma is intentional.
minus-squarebreakfastburrito@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·4 months agoOh interesting. I definitely see that now. I thought it was “passion according to gh”
minus-squareImgonnatrythis@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·4 months agoI read it as about menstruation
minus-squareapfelwoiSchoppen@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·4 months agoInteresting. The sexual assault reading comes from the artist.
minus-squareSoulg@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·4 months agoMy first look was similar. But after reading the comments and looking again, it became more obvious to be about rape.
minus-squareapfelwoiSchoppen@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·4 months agoThat’s what I said, in the comments.
minus-squarebanghida@lemm.eelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·4 months agoOh ok, I see it now. It seemed abstract at first glance.
minus-squareapfelwoiSchoppen@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·4 months agoTotally. It is a bit abstract, or perhaps Dada or Surrealism inspired. It could be said that trauma is baked into those movements.
minus-squareGormadt@lemmy.blahaj.zoneOPlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·4 months agoSometimes to properly show the horrors of the real you have to leave the real behind
minus-squareapfelwoiSchoppen@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·edit-24 months agoYeah, history and art don’t repeat themselves, contemporaries rhyme with the past.
minus-squareSnowclone@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·4 months agoIt’s considered surrealist by which ever groups of Art History PhDs who decide these things
It is about rape, so yeah. The telling of trauma is intentional.
Oh interesting. I definitely see that now. I thought it was “passion according to gh”
I read it as about menstruation
Interesting. The sexual assault reading comes from the artist.
My first look was similar. But after reading the comments and looking again, it became more obvious to be about rape.
That’s what I said, in the comments.
I’m agreeing with you.
Oh ok, I see it now. It seemed abstract at first glance.
Totally. It is a bit abstract, or perhaps Dada or Surrealism inspired. It could be said that trauma is baked into those movements.
Sometimes to properly show the horrors of the real you have to leave the real behind
Yeah, history and art don’t repeat themselves, contemporaries rhyme with the past.
It’s considered surrealist by which ever groups of Art History PhDs who decide these things
Makes sense.