Edited title to add “Candid”

  • remotelove@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    Ok. Let’s break this down: Your definition and interpretation of free speech is irrelevant. You can interpret anything however you want whenever you want and that is fine. Your arguments may not hold up in court and you cannot force that definition on others because you believe you are enlightened.

    As broken as our legal system is, it is all we have for now. As such, you need to understand that the only definition of free speech that matters is the one that has been interpreted by a court of law.

    Here ya go: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bethel_School_District_v._Fraser

    You can keep babbling on like a SovCit if you want, but you need to understand our legal system and how rights work, especially for minors.