• CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      3 months ago

      NASA also built the space shuttle, which was a plane that couldn’t fly by itself (as it was supposed to), was slower to turn around and more expensive than older equivalent technologies, and blew up all the astronauts 1.5% of the time.

      I mean, they’re great at other things - who else could have made the JWST work flawlessly with one opportunity - but they’re a definite source of hype, and they do something very particular and specialised. Beware endorsements.

      Edit: Fuck you, I’m right. Keep 'em coming.

      I don’t even care about Agile either way. This just isn’t a good argument for it.

        • CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          3 months ago

          Yep. They’re probably better than anyone at making a complex system with literal moving parts that works 100% of the time, the first time. On a nearly unlimited budget, with a decades-long schedule. In an institution and culture that’s now a been around a lifetime, staffed with top-notch people.

          That’s all perfect for what NASA does, but I wouldn’t recommend a management system that NASA uses to just anyone, just 'cause “da astronauts” use it. Not any more than I’d recommend drinking your own distilled piss to anyone.

          I don’t really have an opinion on Agile, even, I just have a problem with selling it this way.

    • Match!!@pawb.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      Going to the moon as a step towards going to Mars is so eminently correct that this comic should actually be Agile propaganda