• Matt@lemdro.id
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        Miracast and Chromecast are different. Miracast is the open standard while Chromecast is Google’s proprietary casting protocol.

        Roku supports both Miracast and AirPlay, but I don’t think it supports Chromecast.

        • realcaseyrollins@thelemmy.clubOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 months ago

          Ah, I stand corrected. I heard that Cjhromecast was basically built on the back of Miracast and assumed that they had cross-platform compatibility

  • toynbee@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    A long time ago, I saw a post on Reddit from a user saying (paraphrasing because it was a long long time ago) “the only thing I want from a TV is an HDMI capable rectangle.”

  • Know_not_Scotty_does@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    Basically the only option I have found for a non-connected/smart/spyware tv in the last few months are commercial displays. They must price in the ad revenue to the consumer stuff because the price of those commercial displays is ~4x.

    • prettybunnys@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      Commercial displays often times are more robust as well, designed to be installed and stay on / be switched on and off way more times than your consumer level product.

      Also, yes 100% advertising revenue is baked into the consumer products. They’re being paid to sell you the tv by their 3rd parties too.

    • filister@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      Can’t you simply not connect your display to the Internet, or place it after a firewall which is blocking the internet traffic.

      I seriously don’t understand your concerns.

      • themoken@startrek.website
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        You can, but it’s not a perfect solution. Mostly because the TVs interface is still designed around this app mentality.

        I bought a Samsung TV recently and it’s never been on the internet, but I still have to go to a dead home screen where all of the ads would be just to switch inputs and half the buttons on the remote are for services I don’t want.

      • Buelldozer@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        Can’t you simply not connect your display to the Internet

        Probably, but maybe not. I can think of three ways a Smart TV could potentially get internet access without the owners knowledge.

        1. Amazon Sidewalk
        2. The TV Manufacturer cuts a deal to access the closed WiFi network that many cable operators have on their cable modems or routers.
        3. Via the manufacturers app installed on a smart phone. They often use the app to make setup easier and / or to cast content. There’s no reason the TV can’t log data until the app connects and then use the app to transmit that data to the manufacturer.

        So while the owner could choose not to give their Smart TV a wifi connection that doesn’t mean the TV can’t get one another way.

        • EngineerGaming@feddit.nl
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 months ago

          But they need darkness, a relatively large room and a whole spare wall… Wouldn’t really fit a projector screen in the little corner between the fridge and the cupboard where our TV hangs from an arm, even the smallest ones aren’t small enough. And where would you keep the projector itself, on your lap?

  • devilish666@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    Is there any OLED TV’s out there that has only basic feature without any smart software or google software or other crap thing built in nowadays ?
    I’d like basic feature OLED TV’s like the old times without anyone spying into it.
    Smart TV’s had short lifespan compared to TV’s that had only basic feature because smart TV’s can do anything like smartphones does. i don’t need TV’s that can mimic my smartphone but in 4K UHD 120FPS, i just need OLED TV’s than can display from HDMI or display port, nothing more, nothing less

    • 9488fcea02a9@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      Just dont connect it to the internet.

      That’s what i do with my OLED screen. It acts as a monitor for my HTPC. I dont use any of the apps on the TV

    • Jesus@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      IMHO, it’s best to get a TV with CES and a good amount of HMDI inputs with newer specs.

      Don’t connect the TV to the internet, and use external media players. That’s what I do with my Samsung.

      • DudeDudenson@lemmings.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        2 months ago

        Give them time until they figure out a way to make smart monitors sell somewhat and the entire industry decides that’s the way to go

        • Reddit is better.@dormi.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 months ago

          Nothing like getting served ads through the display whilst simultaneously swallowing more ads from your operating system and also deepthroating even more ads from websites 🤮

  • Jesus@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    I wish this was an article with some analysis. This is literally just the press release from Panasonic’s marketing department.