And additionnaly, isn’t there a way to exploit this so we can store more stuff on PCs?

Edit: can’t thank you all individually but thanks to everyone, I learnt something today, appreciate all of your replies!

  • AstralPath@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    17 days ago

    If you remember the VCR days, imagine your hard drive is a copy of Bambi. You, in preparation for a family event need a tape to store footage of the event on. You decided that you haven’t watched or wanted to watch Bambi in a long time so you designate that tape as the one you’re gonna use when the party day comes.

    At this point your hard drive (the copy of Bambi) has been designated as useable space for new data to be written in the future.

    Bambi is not lost yet and wont be until you write to that tape, therefore if you wanted to you could watch Bambi in the time between now and the party even though you plan to overwrite it. Once Bambi is overwritten, its no longer recoverable but the interim between now when you designate it as useable space and when the space is used, the data persists.

  • CameronDev@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    18 days ago

    You have a notebook. On the first page, you put a table of contents. As you fill in pages, you note them down in the table of contents at the start.

    When you want to delete a page, instead of erasing the whole page now (there are hundreds free still, why waste the effort), you erase the entry in the table of contents.

    Now if someone finds your notebook, according to the table of contents there is no file at page X. But if they were to look through every single page, they would be able to find the page eventually.

    This is loosely how file systems work. You can’t really use it to boost storage, the number of pages is finite, and if you need to write a new page, anything not listed in the contents is fair game to be overwritten.

  • jimmydoreisalefty@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    18 days ago

    IIRC: Data has not been overwritten yet; it is just shown to be open to being rewritten.

    It can still be recovered with minimal corruption if the device was not used too much, where open storage would be eriten over.

  • lurch (he/him)@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    18 days ago

    it’s inefficient to really erase the data, so what happens usually is: it gets marked as deleted. the data only gets overwritten when another file is written in the same data area, which often doesn’t happen immediately. even if a drive gets formatted the empty metadata structures of the new partitions and file systems are just written on top. since they have no file entries yet, the previous data just sits there invisible and inaccessible until new files are created and maybe overwrite a bit of the old data.

  • orcrist@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    18 days ago

    Generally speaking, writing new data is what actually erases old data. So no, you can’t exploit it for extra storage space.

  • NutinButNet@hilariouschaos.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    18 days ago

    Think the best analogy I can give you is this:

    If you write a check and give it to someone, the money has not yet been taken out of your account until they turn that check into cash or deposit it into their bank account.

    Until that time, it is something you are keeping a record of to say “I wrote a check for $700 so I am down $700 in my checking account.” Even though the total balance today says $1700, you know that it really is supposed to be $1000 that is available to be used for other expenses.

    If you wanted to recover that $700, all you need to do is shred the check before it gets to the bank or check cashing place or contact your bank to tell them to not process this check. Thereby, you have essentially “recovered” the $700 you intended to give to someone else.

    This is similar to how your hard drive works. When you tell your computer to delete a file, your computer’s operating system basically tells you that it’s been deleted and no longer lets you access it by normal methods, but that data still exists in a form awaiting an actual deletion. Once you create a new file, your operating system remembers that it had deleted 100MB earlier in the day, so it can now use 25MB of that 100MB it reserved to overwrite some of that file that was deleted, in a sense. However, this whole time, your operating system told you that you had an extra 100MB immediately after you deleted that file, even though it was really being reserved to eventually be replaced.

    Your operating system speaks in binary language of 1’s and 0’s and this file existed as a bunch of 1’s and 0’s. When something else got overwritten, it took some of these 1’s and 0’s from the old file to be turned into space for the new file that is to be created.

    So as long as it’s recent, no new data has been written to the drive, and the computer hasn’t been restarted, the file is still effectively there in the binary language, just not in plain text to you. However, as time goes on, new data is written, or the computer is restarted, then it becomes much more difficult to restore the file. This is mainly because data is always being written to the drive due to the computer doing other things in the background in addition to the things you do on the computer.

    But there isn’t any way to exploit this as this is all due to how much data is available. You have a 1TB drive in your computer and your computer will only ever report 1TB of available storage. It will never report to you that you have more storage unless you’ve done some trickery and even then, it’s just playing with the numbers that you see. Fake USB drives do this where someone sells you what they tell you is 2TB but is actually 16GB and the file has been written to trick the operating system into thinking it has 2TB. If you try to copy more than the actual 16GB of available space, you get an error.

  • 1rre@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    17 days ago

    Storage forensics can look into variations in charge to suggest “this used to be a 1” or “this used to be a 0”

    To store more data that way, it’d have to be analog data in reality, as otherwise data loss due to charge decay would be immense so you’d need so much error checking you’d lose most of the storage savings

  • _____@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    17 days ago

    It’s because hard drives don’t turn every written bit into a 0. Instead it tells the operating system that the region you deleted is free for writing again.

    At some point in the future through usage that region will either be corrupted or have something completely different in it (from our perspective though it may read as corrupt it will still work as expected when written into)

  • TheBananaKing@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    17 days ago

    A file comes in two parts: the actual blocks of data that hold the file itself, and a directory entry with the name of the file, and the location of the first block.

    When you delete a file, it only scrubs out the directory entry, and re-lists the data blocks as available for use.

  • pixeltree@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    17 days ago

    If I tell you all the boxes in a warehouse are empty, that doesn’t mean they are. It just means I think they are. You can go and check them manually to see if they’re actually empty or if I was lying or forgot there was stuff in them. The metaphor breaks down a little bit here but if you look at the boxes closely, the ones with dust on top were probably empty for a long time and the ones without were probably emptied recently.

  • dodgy_bagel@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    17 days ago

    Follow up question: If I reformat and write my drive with 0s, how reliable are the mechanisms to recover previously stored data on:

    • An hdd
    • A ssd

    Asking as a hypothetical for a hypothetical friend.

    • TheBananaKing@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      17 days ago

      If you actually fill the drive with zeroes, the chances of anyone getting anything back are somewhere between fuck and all.

      Old MFM drives (tech likely as old as your parents) had a theoretical exploit for recovering erased data.

      With modern tech, that loophole was firmly closed; even state-level actors would be shit outta luck.

  • InFerNo@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    18 days ago

    On ext4 drives 5% is reserved for the system in emergencies. Since disks are getting larger over the year, 5% is a pretty big chunk. It’s possible to tell the system to use a lower reserve. It’s the only instance I know where you can seemingly gain more storage out of thin air. I’ve used it in moments of emergencies when a servers’ disk was too full to function.

  • Transient Punk@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    18 days ago

    Often times when you delete something off a computer, the computer simply deletes the address of the data, but doesn’t overwrite the data.

    Think of a map for a city. If you delete a house off the map, you may not be able to find it anymore, but the house is still there. It’s the same for computer storage

  • TESTNET@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    18 days ago

    Because as long as it isn’t overwritten it can sometimes reside in a residual way in the storage sectors on the drive, these hdd scanning software’s check through the sectors for data hiding in them some sucxessfully some not as successfully, there for some will find more or less data than others do as well.

    This is why data disappears on drives as well when a physical issue causes the sectors of the drive to begin to stop working aka “bad sectors” this makes the data start to seemingly magically vanish or corrupt if it’s still operating and booting into Windows you can at times witness the data/folders and or files present in folders one moment and missing fron the OS the next, that’s an indictator often of an imminent drive failure due to bad sectors. In this scenario it get’s less likely you’ll recover the data the longer the drive is in use because more of the sectors will probably die. You want to be doing the recovery and not using the drive in Windows in this instance. I say Windows but it applies to any HDD with any OS installed really.

  • Snot Flickerman@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    18 days ago

    The only way to truly securely delete data is disc destruction. Remove the drive and drill through the hard disk platter or the SSD memory chips.

    • FuglyDuck@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      18 days ago

      Even a single overwrite process is sufficient to stop most attempts at recovery- the only people who might be able to reconstruct that data are… like top FBI forensic labs, and similar.

      Even then, most of the data would be coming back corrupted and mostly useless.

      2 or 3 overwrites are sufficient to prevent that as well.

      For SSD’s, a single overwrite renders it impossible, simply based on how the data is physically stored- there’s no residual “footprint” or “ghost”- the NAND flash memory used floating-gate transistors to store the data. Either the gate is flipped or it’s not, there’s no way to know if it was previously flipped, only what its current state is.

      Physical destruction is usually only recommended for extreme cases, where that drive held extremely sensitive data- where the consequences of any amount of that data being recovered would be catastrophic, even then the process begins with overwriting data. (Also keep in mind just breaking the platers aren’t enough- they have to be shattered into ittybitties.)