• bokster@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    That sounds like anecdotal evidence. Android is more popular in more than half of the world and a lot of apps are successful and generate income on both platforms.

    • Balder@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      It’s not, iOS has something like almost 70% of the mobile apps income despite having 1/3 or users compared to Android.

      Also Android has this annoying problem where there pirate versions of an app will show up when it has in-app purchases or scammers will rip-off your app, rebrand it and place an overwhelming amount of ads to make a quick buck before the app is flagged and taken down. That’s not accounting for the stories of accounts simply being taken down without warning.

    • lepinkainen@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      Nope, not anecdotal. It’s actual industry fact.

      The phone you use combined with the country you’re in is a very good indicator on how likely you are to spend money in an app.

    • mholiv@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      If you look at developer experience it’s absolutely is true. Android users just prefer free/ad supported/pirated software. If your an android user look at your own habits. What android applications have your purchased?

      You can search for statistics from any source online and you’ll get the same results. But in the end if you code for iOS you need to test and debug for fewer devices and you will make more money overall. There are wayyyy more android users but 70% of all mobile app spend is on iOS. Deving for iOS just makes sense if you like money.

      https://backlinko.com/iphone-vs-android-statistics#iphone-vs-android-app-spending

      • bokster@lemmy.sdf.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        None of this account for differences in purchasing power and phone price.

        If you have an $150 Android device, I would of course expect you to spend way less on software than somebody with a $1500 iPhone.

        I’m not saying ‘develop for Android only’ but if your business relies on one ecosystem only, you’re at a higher risk and you’re leaving money on the table.

        • mholiv@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 months ago

          You are 100% right.

          If you dev for only one you will be leaving money on the table. But for small / solo devs I can 100% see why focusing on iOS and those high paying customers makes sense if all you care about is money.

          Then once you have a customer base then you build out an android team/app.

          I’m not saying it should be this way. I’m just saying I understand why it is this way.

        • Jojo, Lady of the West@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 months ago

          an $150

          a $1500

          How do you pronounce these? An 'undred and fifty? I’m honestly curious, because I can’t feel like an fits on either. I wasn’t going to care enough to ask but then you put a on one thousand five hundred.