Telegram founder's arrest is radical — if it's a crime to build privacy tools, there will be no privacy
www.crikey.com.au
Pavel Durov's arrest suggests that the law enforcement dragnet is being widened from private financial transactions to private speech.

Pavel Durov’s arrest suggests that the law enforcement dragnet is being widened from private financial transactions to private speech.

The arrest of the Telegram CEO Pavel Durov in France this week is extremely significant. It confirms that we are deep into the second crypto war, where governments are systematically seeking to prosecute developers of digital encryption tools because encryption frustrates state surveillance and control. While the first crypto war in the 1990s was led by the United States, this one is led jointly by the European Union — now its own regulatory superpower.

Durov, a former Russian, now French citizen, was arrested in Paris on Saturday, and has now been indicted. You can read the French accusations here. They include complicity in drug possession and sale, fraud, child pornography and money laundering. These are extremely serious crimes — but note that the charge is complicity, not participation. The meaning of that word “complicity” seems to be revealed by the last three charges: Telegram has been providing users a “cryptology tool” unauthorised by French regulators.

  • istanbullu@lemmy.ml
    0·
    2 months ago

    ANYONE who understood how telegram works and also felt it was a tool for privacy doesn’t really understand privacy in the digital age.

    Telegram is the most realistic alternative to breaking Meta’s monopoly. You might like Signal very much, but nobody uses it and the user experience is horrible.

    • octopus_ink@lemmy.mlEnglish
      0·
      2 months ago

      Telegram is the most realistic alternative to breaking Meta’s monopoly. You might like Signal very much, but nobody uses it and the user experience is horrible.

      Joke’s on you, I use nothing by Meta, nor Signal, nor telegram. My comment had nothing whatsoever to do with what I like or not.

    • Pup Biru@aussie.zoneEnglish
      0·
      2 months ago

      if metas monolopoloy is literally the only thing you care about, but replacing a terrible platform with another platform that lacks privacy protections is not much of an upgrade

    • Wave@lemmy.mlEnglish
      0·
      2 months ago

      Terrible take, as as much as I hate to admit it, Meta doesnt have a “Monopoly”. An Oligopoly can be argued, but there are clear alternatives for all 4 of their big apps that are mainstream and used by millions. Signal, Telegram, Snapchat, Tiktok, Discord, Tumblr, Pinterest, the list can go on and on… Not to mention if we’re looking to “break a monopoly” we shouldnt be going to closed source bullshit to let someone else come in and make another monopoly. We know nothing of Telegrams back end. At least Signal has theirs open source.