• dinckel@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 months ago

    Allowing these companies to ever sell anything with the “cloud” marketing was a colossal mistake. Not only it was a waste of people’s money, but now also e-waste

  • riodoro1@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 months ago

    People who bought these are fucking idiots and they deserve much worse then their stupid fucking smart shoes turning into abandonware.

    Maybe we wouldn’t have so much shit in landfills if those idiots didn’t gobble up any piece of trash someone wants to sell them.

    • Cornpop@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      I could see handicapped people being interested in these. Fuck then I guess right.

      • riodoro1@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        4 months ago

        Sure. We totally didn’t have footwear that did not require lacing. Thank god for the tech bro solution. What would the disadvantaged people do if it wasn’t for the free market!

        Btw, you really think their app was accessible to handicapped people?

  • DarkThoughts@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 months ago

    TIL about self-lacing shoes… What a waste of fucking resources. Might as well add some flashing red lights at the back of the soles if you already have batteries in them.

    • naeap@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      Lights in shoes that blink at each step were all the hype in my childhood

    • hesusingthespiritbomb@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      Honestly if they got the cost down and figured out a better interaction mechanism than an app, I could see it being useful for older or disabled individuals.

      For example, imagine someone is 55. They are still with it, and decently active for this age. However they have arthritis in their hands that makes tasks that require dexterity mildly uncomfortable. These kinds of shoes would be a pretty big boon for them in terms of staying active.

      The issue is that they tried to make it some cool fashion accessory for Gen Z sneaker heads to buy.

      • DarkThoughts@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 months ago

        They have buttons on the shoes too. Still, having a battery for something like this is just wasteful and pointless. People with disabilities have already several unpowered alternatives that work perfectly fine and as mentioned, those things are clearly not designed for that purpose in mind anyway.

      • Lumisal@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        4 months ago

        You could also just, idk, by Velcro shoes or get lock laces.

        Edit: Got downvoted but that’s literally what my mother with arthritis uses. Lock laces and a shoe horn. Lock laces are basically the low tech and reliable version of what these app shoes have.

  • sylver_dragon@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 months ago

    If something requires an “app” and a connection to “the cloud” for basic functionality, don’t buy it. This sort of abandonment by the manufacturer will always happen. Maybe it will last longer. Maybe it will be next week. But once the company has your money, the last thing they want to do is to spend any of that money providing you with support.

      • Norodix@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 months ago

        Its still stupid. No reason there is no embedded web interface. That is such an easy thing to do. Like routers have been doing for ages.

          • Norodix@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            4 months ago

            Then it still doesn’t take away anything from you. How would an additional embedded web based control panel impact you negatively? If you don’t use it just don’t use it. But it ensures longevity and makes the device entirely self-contained.

    • Zoolander@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      The funny thing about this is that the first time I had that moment of realization was when I got the Sphero BB-8 toy from my kids for Christmas. It had a dedicated app. The reason it’s funny is because, out of all the things that I own, it’s the only app-driven one that still works. Sphero just merged it into their main app. Once that app stops getting updated, this toy will cease to work despite everything about it being functional. ☹️

      • Tikiporch@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 months ago

        As long as you can side load a functional apk to a supported Android device, it should work, no?

        • halcyoncmdr@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          4 months ago

          Android eventually locks out apps designed for older APIs. I remember reading about a bunch of abandoned apps being dropped from the Play Store for that reason. Not sure if that’s just the Play Store though or if it is the Android OS itself. I haven’t ever kept a phone beyond the manufacturer providing security updates since I actually use my phone for secure things.

          • ozymandias117@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            edit-2
            4 months ago

            You have to enable developer mode and install with --bypass-low-target-sdk-block now.

            Dunno if they’ll remove that eventually

      • sylver_dragon@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 months ago

        That’s funny, I have the exact same toy. It was a Father’s day gift years ago. It’s now an expensive display piece, as the battery no longer seems to hold a charge. And, as best I can tell, the battery is well sealed inside, making replacement impossible. Yet another thing I hate about our disposable culture.

      • webghost0101@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 months ago

        This is why i am for mandatory open sourcing of abandonware. So much stuff just laying wasted that could be hacked.

        But allowing you to diy your own toys might make you consume less and thats bad or something.

    • jdeath@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      I’m laughing my ass off thinking about all the steps required to get these working if you bought them new. downloading an app and pairing your shoes to wifi or some shit. ha

      if the internet goes down can you still put on your shoes?! lmao!

  • Tikiporch@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 months ago

    In a world where I can slip my shoes on and off without untying them, why would I need shoes that can self-tie?

    • Jumi@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      You’re questioning the sanity of people who even develop shoes that need an app

    • Jesus@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      Inevitably what happens after 5 years is that someone reports that the app doesn’t work well with a newer version of iOS or Android, and the person that led the engineering on it is gone, because much of your engineering org has turned over after 5 years.

      Then a new person jumps into the old project, finds out that it’s had 1 active user last year, then they question why they have to spend a week bug fixing something for one end user.

      • Knossos@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 months ago

        As a developer, this is the answer. I can’t wait for the day I can finally stop supporting old Amazon Kindle devices.

  • pandapoo@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    4 months ago

    To be fair, anyone who thought their life needed SaaS supported shoe laces, definitely had this coming.

    In terms of cosmic corporate evildoers, Nike may not currently be a top ranked contender, but their definitely an old school hall of fame level player.

    So while not saying they were doing the world a favor by dropping cloud shoe lace support, I am saying that the situation is hilarious.