• Etterra@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 months ago

    Well now I wish I was an influencer so that I could get paid for giving China the middle finger.

  • Chee_Koala@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 months ago

    Hahahaha, wow, what a bunch of wet noodles. If you don’t want negative discourse, maybe don’t be misogynistic. Or don’t publish your work in countries where free speech and personal freedoms are more abundant. No one is forcing you to publish here, so please keep your demands in your pants. Pffft, I was really interested in this game, now it’s such an easy pass!

    • batcheck@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      Out of curiosity, since I’m out of the loop, what is the misogynistic discourse around the game or studio? Is it based on themes of the books/mythology the game is based on? Or is it some other thing the devs went too far with eastern culture wise?

      • Chee_Koala@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 months ago

        I read some articles from 2020 that touched on the culture @ Game Science, but it doesn’t even really matter. It’s just the way they single out stuff that feels really put of touch, pretty (ignorant) boomer attitude. I’ve only heard the word “feminist propaganda” from folks who are misogynistic, it’s not something I associate with caring about inequality. Can you imagine being a woman influencer that got this message? I would think 3 times before partnering up with a party that gave me this dos and don’t list.

        It’s probably something that can be attributed to cultural differences, but that doesn’t mean that much to me. You move in a culture, but you are still responsible for you actions and words.

        • batcheck@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          4 months ago

          Thank you. I mainly wanted to know what the talking points are so I can have effective conversations with the people around. This one semi popped out of nowhere for me and I felt I missed something.

          Agreed, the term “feminist propaganda” alone here is enough to make me question the studio/publisher leadership group.

          @Chee_Koala, I’ve read your other comment on this post and I agree with you. Going to pass on the game. It’s the reality of today. If we want things to improve we have to vote with our democratic right to vote if we have it or we vote with our money. This type of topic pops up a lot in media, big tech and most other large companies that somewhat dominate an industry. There are enough options out there where we can’t always make the perfect moral decision, but we can at least try to choose on the lesser of many evils in our shopping and media consumption based on the information we have.

  • smeg@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 months ago

    However, it’s clear Game Science, through Hero Games, is keen to control the narrative around Black Myth: Wukong to avoid negative coverage and ensure focus is on the game itself.

    Given that this is the first I’ve heard of this game and I know nothing about the game itself, I feel they’ve shot themselves in the foot a little, eh?

    • Alimentar@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      Nah for a while now, this was highly anticipated within the gaming community. Journalists have covered allegations and controversies but honestly no one really cared. People wanted a good game and they got one. Politics or not, their steam review is 96% at overwhelmingly positive.

    • Virkkunen@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      The studio and the CEO have a history of misoginy and sexism, so they’re trying to block reviewers to speak about it

      • PunchingWood@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 months ago

        Well that explains something, but honestly it has nothing to do with the actual game itself. Would be kinda weird if reviewers focused on that instead of the game.

            • TJA!@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              edit-2
              4 months ago

              Yes, you are right. Everyone had to draw the line themselves. And if you only stop buying a game if it is from Putin, that is indeed your decision. But it obviously also means, that you do made your decision not only on the game itself. So I am not sure what your argument is here.

                • TJA!@sh.itjust.works
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  4 months ago

                  I am sure you know that, but if not:

                  I am using Putin as an extreme example to discuss the broader question of whether the ethics and actions of creators should influence consumer decisions, and not because Putin is directly related to the situation being discussed. Even if a notorious figure like Putin were to release a game, some people, like you in this case, might argue that the game’s quality alone should be the deciding factor in whether to support it, while others might refuse to support it based on the creator’s actions or background. I was just trying to find out if there is a line you are not going to cross or if you will play it no matter the circumstances as long as you think the game is good. And as it turns out, based on this conversation, there is a line for you and it’s literally “the game was created by Putin”

          • exu@feditown.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            4 months ago

            It’s a difficult issue. If Putin did release a game, did we know beforehand? How widespread was the knowledge? How did this info come to light?

            I guess it’s similar to reports about crunch culture in many game studios. Do we want to support that and buy the game?
            Or sexual harassment by C-level, same question.

            Many people might not care, but some do and it’s still information to consider.

  • FeelzGoodMan420@eviltoast.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    4 months ago

    I have a simple solution to all of this. Just simply don’t read video game news articles. You’re welcome. But seriously, all of these “game journalism” sites are just AI garbage at this point. Just go on discord and talk to real people about games, or watch a digital foundry video. Like i have literally never heard of this “controversy” until reading this post. It’s just simply not on my radar. Idk why people even engage with this nonsense. I don’t watch influencers. I don’t have social media. I NEVER have to see this dogshit unless it comes up here on Lemmy lol.

    • StoneyDcrew@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      Edit: downvoted for not wanting to pay attention to stupid controversy about video games? Weird…

      It’s one thing to live peacefully in ignorance. I get it. it is exhausting keeping track of every shitty thing a company does when it’s so much easier at the end of an exhausting 9-5 shift to avoid news and play your games guilt free without thinking about who it’s hurting.

      It’s a completely separate thing to brag that your ignorance somehow makes your way of life superior.

      People caring about these issues, and sometimes leading to actions being taken because of that, all makes the gaming industry, or to be hyberbolic; the world a better place.

      It’s fine to avoid news on controversy and just blindly enjoy games, but don’t lie to yourself (and others) by pretending that it is a good thing.

  • yamanii@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 months ago

    IGN’s hitpiece was very iffy in the first place, with mistranslated “tweets” from one of the devs weibo and all, but by doing these guidelines they gave ammunition to these people, I’m glad the game is doing well at least so hopefully china keeps making good, AAA games that aren’t also gacha for once.

  • Rentlar@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 months ago

    The guidelines are also likely in place to avoid mention of previous reports of misogyny at the studio. Posts from Game Science CEO Féng Jì including sexualised and misogynistic language were reported on in 2020, while IGN also reported on the studio’s history with sexism.

    Lol, a Streisand effect here.

  • TimLovesTech (AuDHD)(he/him)@badatbeing.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 months ago

    For anyone not clicking thru:

    In full, the don’ts are:

    • Do NOT insult other influencers or players.
    • Do NOT use any offensive language/humour.
    • Do NOT include politics, violence, nudity, feminist propaganda, fetishisation, and other content that instigates negative discourse.
    • Do NOT use trigger words such as ‘quarantine’ or ‘isolation’ or ‘Covid-19’.
    • Do NOT discuss content related to China’s game industry policies, opinions, news, etc.

    I see this as them wanting influencers to focus on their game, instead of using the game as a platform to wade into these other topics that focus on the country they happen to live in. And this being an election year in the US ,and the Right having spread wild conspiracy theories about China for years now, them not wanting any of that stuff to overshadow their art doesn’t seem all that crazy of a take. Basically they are saying they want influencers to talk about the game and to leave politics to /c/politics.

    Oh and this is of course only sent to influencers, so just people they are giving the game to for free. The rest of the world (including influencers that buy their own copy) are of course free to do whatever they are legally allowed to in their jurisdiction.

  • style99@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 months ago

    Funny how quickly free speech drops dead whenever right-wing snowflakes get involved.

      • cecinestpasunbot@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 months ago

        China has plenty of right wingers and social conservatives living there. They just can’t organize for their beliefs outside of the existing political structures.

      • style99@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 months ago

        What’s funny is anyone thinking Chinese government has anything to do with communism.

        • Echo Dot@feddit.uk
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          4 months ago

          It’s just fascism at this point mascarading as communism. Rather like Russia in that regard.