• yeehaw@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      This would work, if people wouldn’t buy them regardless. I have no doubt this console will be successful, but I’m not gonna kid myself and think nobody is going to buy it at that price.

      • NastyNative@mander.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 month ago

        With this economy the sales numbers will be low. They should consider a 300 price point and make up the loses with the sale of their games.

  • Rhynoplaz@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    I’m not a big Nintendo fan, because of their pricing and lawsuits, but I’m siding with them on this one.

    If you can’t afford a Switch 2, don’t buy one.

    This is coming from someone who really couldn’t afford one right now. We wait until we can or the price goes down (oh wait. Nintendo doesn’t do that )

    • inclementimmigrant@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      I think it very tone deaf with regards to how their trying to up the prices of games, which I think is BS, and increasing the price of accessories, and locking things behind subscriptions.

      Very much so a Blizzard, “don’t you have phones?” Type of situation.

    • Hyphlosion@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      1 month ago

      Or, and hear me out…

      If you’re working on your credit score… Go for it!

      I was able to get an Xbox Series X and made on-time monthly payments for it over 2 years. It opened a new line of credit and regular automatic payments toward it did wonders for my credit score.

  • Katana314@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    Although we still number consoles, in a lot of ways we did get our “tiered” console structure.

    Take most people’s daily plays, and I’d say about 90% of them or more have an edition available on the prior gen console. And it makes sense when so many of those games have relatively basic graphics - and when game engines have gotten better at scalability.

    So, those consoles are neatly serving as a low budget option for a lot of gamers that can’t follow all the latest and most expensive games. Yes, some newer releases will be fully excluded; but even then, getting a brand new or used Switch or PS4 can introduce someone to a huge number of games if they haven’t been exploring options.

    • deranger@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      Big Xbox One release vibes.

      “Fortunately we have a product for people who aren’t able to stay connected; it’s called Xbox 360” - Don Mattrick, Microsoft’s President of Interactive Entertainment Business

      • shinratdr@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 month ago

        Except that was about internet connectivity and this is about price. Telling people to go with the old console because they can’t due to a bullshit restriction is crazy, saying it about price is pretty fair. If you can’t afford a current gen console, then the last gen would be the best option. At $450USD it will still be the cheapest console on the market other than the Switch 1.

        I’m honestly shocked people are so up in arms about the price. Doesn’t really seem like Nintendo is gouging here, a comparable phone or tablet with the same specs comes in around the same price or higher. It has pretty much every feature people were asking for at about a $100USD premium over the existing Switch.

        Raising standard game prices, charging for the tutorial app, and charging for next gen upgrades, that I get the pushback on.

        • deranger@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 month ago

          They’re both about price in my opinion.

          Personally I don’t feel the console itself is that bad, but $80 Nintendo games, that never go on sale, can fuck right off.

        • Ephera@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 month ago

          Well, traditionally, console prices were subsidized by the more expensive game prices. They’d sell the console at a loss to then make that back per game. Them raising both the console price as well as game prices is what makes it awful.

            • Ephera@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              1 month ago

              I mean, if it’s still shit and it’s getting even worse, I don’t know why we wouldn’t continue to mourn that, or at least call it out.

        • Takumidesh@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 month ago

          A base model steam deck is $50 cheaper than this, a base model Xbox series s is $150 dollars cheaper, and it’s the same price as a PS5 slim.

  • polle@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    It would be nice when the switch 1 would grt cheaper though. Its ridiculous how expensive it still is.

  • Puzzlehead@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    But how will we play Mario Kart World? Why not release it on Switch 1? Oh that’s right, they want people to buy the new gaming system. Screw others who can’t afford it. It’s just a couple hundred extra bucks. Just put that extra money aside for two months and you will have your Switch 2.

  • arudesalad@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    1 month ago

    What’s annoying about this is that (at least for me) the switch 2’s price is not the problem (outside of the USA, good luck to American Nintendo fans, you’ll need it), I get that it is expensive for a Nintendo console (I probably couldn’t afford one) but it has hardware worth the price (from what I have seen, feel free to correct me). The problem are the overpriced games, £75 (physical)/£67 (digital) is too much even for a Nintendo game. Do Nintendo really think they can just get away with prices that inflated in a market where most families will go “but we already have Mario Kart! Why spend another £430!!”

    • Nikls94@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      Not to sound like a fanboy, I mean I am but that’s not why, but I get the Mario Kart price tag.

      I’ve had a switch from day 1 and look in the e-shop charts about once a week, and Mario Kart was consistently in the top 20 most sold games of the past 2 weeks.

      From a switch perspective, you paid $70 for MarioKart + $25 for the DLC and got a single game a lot of people played since April 2017. In that same time you got 8 Call of Duty games for $70 each ($560) - with the later CoDs charging you $30 for chores or “Battle Passes”. Or you could have paid 95 Fortnite Battle Passes (total ~$950) since the launch of MarioKart.

      I forgot the point I wanted to make.

      • Macaroni_ninja@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 month ago

        if only MK, Fortnite and CoD would be the only three options for gamers then probably MK would win this round.

        Unfortunately you comparing your favourite game to two vomit piles full of microtransaction and battle passes so cant see your point there.

        If you enjoy the games Nintendo sells go for it, in my opinion the inflated new prices are ridiculous and will have a negative impact on the gaming industry in global as other big corpos will start copying them if Nintendo can get away with it.

      • chunkystyles@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 month ago

        MK 8 is also a previous generation title that Nintendo got to double dip on already.

        MK night be a good value proposition for some folks. It’s still too expensive. I have games that I’ve paid $20, $10, sometimes even less for that I’ve gotten more play time out of. Play time to cost is not a good argument.

        Let me also contrast with some of Nintendo’s worst practices, like selling 3 old Mario games with no enhancements, that are just emulated, for $60.

    • piyuv@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      Also the greed. Charging for the virtual tour game (however cheap it may be), charging for performance updates to existing games (not extra content, only performance). Switch 1 games should just run better on the new console by default.

      I’m not even sure hw is fairly priced. They’re able to sell the same thing in Japan for 100$ cheaper. I don’t think they’re losing money there.