It was a got damn stunt, offc

  • Letme@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    8 hours ago

    The fix is in, and TikTok is now just another implement in Trump and Elon’s disinformation machine. Crazy times, our country is literally being run by the top social media platforms.

  • Snapz@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    9 hours ago

    The AP is supposed to be a neutral source, but they are decidedly right leaning.

    There is clear, relevant reporting to be done on how odd the structure of all this is and that the app’s self imposed shutdown message specifically praised trump, by name. They buried a photo of it, but I don’t see direct text in the article discussing that. They also don’t mention the fact that the CEO had been privately meeting with trump recently.

    They say Biden had a part in the ban, though he said publicly he would not enforce it - what matters there, that AP doesn’t mention, is that the republicans hello humanitarian aide to Ukraine hostage back in April, saying they’d block unless the rock you ban was passed. Laying the groundwork for this hollow attempt to “blame Biden” and position trunk as a solution (to a problem he instigated and that republican think tanks engineered).

    They do say the CEO will attend and have a “prime seating location” but not clarifying that the seats he’ll be in are typically reserved for living past US presidents.

    Fucking joke

  • BigMacHole@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    9 hours ago

    GOOD! I’m looking Forward to Trump RESTORING this App that he said was CHYNESE SPYWARE being used to Hurt Americans!

  • Snapz@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    9 hours ago

    Spreading for awareness, I’ve been posting this in relevant threads for a week - This is all theater.

    trump was always going to “save” tik tok after starting the initial push to ban it (for the wrong reasons) to pretend he did something for you. Worst part is that all of the no/low info voters and non voters will eat it up.

    It’s the equivalent of a person pushing you into the middle of the street and at the very last second, that same person tells the drivers to all stop. “Wow, I owe you my life!”

    And now, this adds two layers:

    1. You think trump and the Supreme Court are colluding? now they get to say, nah uh!!! Even though again, this is all convoluted.

    2. trump gets to look “stronger” than the “highest court in the land” to help delude the next generation of low info tiktok folks.

    P.s. The Chinese “protest” apps that were downloaded are going to mine the FUCK out of these millions of phones in the brief window they have them. Also, when the kids inevitably move back to tiktok, majority of them will still leave these other apps installed on their phones, dormant and collecting indefinitely in the background.

    • Pacattack57@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 hours ago

      People like you really don’t get it. You can’t wrap your head around people not caring about their data.

      There are people DYING because they don’t have access to affordable healthcare. There are families forced to live in section 8 housing because they can’t afford to feed their family and have a place to live at the same time. Our children are DYING in school while the police sit outside and watch. WE DONT GIVE A FUCK ABOUT OUR DATA.

      This whole debacle should infuriate every single American. 85% of congress voted to disenfranchise 150 MILLION Americans. These assholes can’t agree on anything but they can agree on this. It’s a travesty that our elected officials can spoon feed you some bullshit about China and you forget how they don’t care about you.

        • DaddysLittleSlut@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          4 hours ago

          Simple. We choose to give our data to another country instead of companies that sell our data without us knowing. Also in Little red book. You see it tells the users to be cautious where they share their facial data and that it’s not needed to use the app?

          • Snapz@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            3 hours ago

            You’re not making a lot of sense… It also seems that you’re under the impression that tiktok doesn’t sell data and ad profiles like all other social media networks?

        • hitmyspot@aussie.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          6 hours ago

          I think it’s a valid point that the concern being raised about tik tok is just as valid with other apps, both from Facebook or Twitter etc and from overseas apps. People are happily giving up their data and don’t see a distinction in how it is being used for disinformation by different state actors. It’s all misinformation.

          People are apathetic to the risk, but also don’t see the risk for foreign government snooping as significantly higher than internal snooping.

          • DaddysLittleSlut@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            4 hours ago

            Many people also don’t consider the willingness and commitment to giving China data now. I mean if Facebook, Twitter and else wise. Is scanning our wifi to see what is connected to it and what we have access to. Why not go ahead and give our data to a country they’ll sell the data to.

  • Max-P@lemmy.max-p.me
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    10 hours ago

    I bet the new algorithm will be pushing push far right content to everyone just like Twitter and Meta, this was a stunt to silence the leftists.

    • _cryptagion@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      10 hours ago

      Well, it’s a federal law, so yeah, basically. I mean, it’s kind of up to the president if the DOJ actually prosecutes people for breaking federal law. Take Biden for example. He just pardoned a bunch of people who were in prison for federal drug charges. The laws they broke are still on the books, and what they did was still technically illegal, even if it’s stupid to begin with.

      Somebody at the DOJ could just go rogue and try to enforce the laws, but they would just be fired if the president didn’t like it.

      • sunzu2@thebrainbin.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        9 hours ago

        He just pardoned a bunch of people who were in prison for federal drug charges

        These weren’t even the worst pardons…

        He let out some cunt who robbed her town blind.

        Imagine being corrupt and then being pardoned by the president. That’s a slap to the taxpayer

  • breakfastmtn@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    10 hours ago

    I’m way more interested in the reactions of Google, Apple, Oracle, and the dozens of other corporations ByteDance depends on.

    The “90-day extension” Trump keeps talking about has no basis in law except to conclude an in-process divestment, which currently doesn’t exist. He can order the law not to be enforced, but you’re still breaking the law. It’ll interesting to see if those companies are willing to along with an executive order their counsel knows is illegal or are willing to knowingly break the law under the promise they won’t be prosecuted (for now).

    edit: IANAL

    • Beej Jorgensen@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      7 hours ago

      has no basis in law

      Wikipedia says, with a couple references:

      The president may grant a one-time extension of the divestiture deadline by as long as 90 days if a path to a qualified divestiture has been identified, “significant” progress has been made to executing the divestiture, and legally binding agreements for facilitating the divestiture are in place.

      So I think he can do it.

      • breakfastmtn@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        7 hours ago

        as long as 90 days if a path to a qualified divestiture has been identified, “significant” progress has been made to executing the divestiture, and legally binding agreements for facilitating the divestiture are in place.

        My point is that no path has been identified, no progress has been made, and nothing is in place.

        • Beej Jorgensen@lemmy.sdf.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          7 hours ago

          Point taken, but I’m just going to presume that all that will be declared satisfied in the EO in some token form or another.

    • _cryptagion@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      10 hours ago

      I mean, they can get away with it. They own the government, if the next president threw a fit about them going along with something that they knew was illegal because Trump was OK with it, do you think their lawyers wouldn’t be able to make it go away for a meager fine that’s 0.001% of their annual revenue?

  • BananaTrifleViolin@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    11 hours ago

    This story has lots more to run. Trump is giving them a 90 day reprieve but hes going to try and extract something from them.

    I suspect he will still try and get them to sell to one of his cronies. And bytedance won’t do that.

  • Kekzkrieger@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    11 hours ago

    Call me crazy but this feels all like a plan to push the Maga movement, first the “bad democrats” take away the “lovely” tiktok, then “good” trump brings back the beloved “noncensorship” tiktok because he “loves” freedom of speech or smth.

  • priapus@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    11 hours ago

    The decomcrats are fucking morons for allowing Trump to take credit for this. This was the obvious outcome and was easily preventable.

  • Mrkawfee@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    11 hours ago

    Gaza ceasefire and reversed TikTok ban. He’s basically won over younger voters before he’s even started.

  • bdonvr@thelemmy.club
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    11 hours ago

    I dunno if app stores are gonna bring it back though.

    The law stipulates like, ridiculously massive (seriously like $5k PER USER) fines for hosting it. I dunno if a legally-dubious pinky promise from Trump will be enough for them.

    • _cryptagion@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      10 hours ago

      That’s only really a problem for iOS users though. For Android users, you can just load the APK onto the phone and go.