• Home routing and encryption technologies are making lawful interception harder for Europol
  • PET-enabled home routing allows for secure communication, hindering law enforcement’s ability to intercept and monitor communications
  • Europol suggests solutions such as disabling PET technologies and implementing cross-border interception standards to address the issue.
    • justsomeguy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      Privacy Enhancing Technologies. A blanket term for anything protecting your identity (Onion, VPN, etc.) I feel like the people asking for this either have a very limited technical understanding of it or completely different motives. You can’t ban encryption. What they could do is ban VPN services from officially operating or certain protocols but that would mostly hit your regular user.

  • blahsay@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    4 months ago

    Good. ‘Lawful’ interception is total nonsense. They’d have a camera up everyone’s ass if they could.

    As it is our TVs bloody listen to us…1984 is here.

  • Treczoks@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 months ago

    Oh my! Encryption makes it harder to snoop uninvited into things that should not concern them in the first place! Shocking!

  • SlopppyEngineer@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 months ago

    That’s going to be a recurring theme. Law enforcement starts scanning one thing, businesses, criminals and citizens start using something else. They’ll have to forbid everything that’s not open, but by then legal businesses stop using the net because all their secrets get stolen.

  • 𝕸𝖔𝖘𝖘@infosec.pub
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 months ago

    I fixed the bulleted.

    • Home routing and encryption technologies are making lawful interception spying on innocent civilians harder for Europol

    • PET-enabled home routing allows for secure communication, hindering preventing law enforcement’s ability to intercept and monitor spy on the communications of innocent civilians

    • Europol suggests solutions such as disabling PET technologies and implementing cross-border interception standards to address the issue of Europol not knowing how to do their jobs without resorting to Orwellian dystopian techniques

    • PET technologies does exactly what it’s intended to do–protect the innocent civilian from the prying eyes of the not innocent bodies that are hellbent on eroding privacy and security

  • doctortofu@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 months ago

    Warning: non-transparent walls, window blinds and door locks prevent lawful interception and surveillance - how are the authorities supposed to know you’re not doing something naughty in there?

    • j4k3@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      Clothing hides weapons! So do fat folds. Kill all the fat people and go naked for a crime free world in the new authoritarian bridge between Nazis and Stalinists for a wonderful Europe.

      • vortic@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 months ago

        There are places a skinny naked person can hide things. What do we do about that?

        • j4k3@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          4 months ago

          Kill them all. If your butt cheeks touch in the middle you get the antisemitic/Palestinian treatment. Would you like to die by rocket, bomb, on the hood of a car, as a joke, career suicide, anonymous mass grave, student failure with no future, self emulation, militant untrained police, starvation, Kremlin backed Right faction first world extremist regime mob of fucktards, or randomly one of the above? Heil Europe!

    • rottingleaf@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      how are the authorities supposed to know you’re not doing something naughty in there?

      Humans are actually supposed to do naughty things. Otherwise they’d be worried about demography

  • hoshikarakitaridia@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    4 months ago

    lawful interception

    Idk bout that. Usually you get a warrant for wiretapping and then you pay someone to install it. If they are trying to break encryption or identifying users, that means they inherently are doing something the law does not favor.

    Let’s also acknowledge that if encryption is bad because it cannot be broken, that means encryption is pretty good at what it should do.

    Breaking encryption is never something you do for the right reasons.

    • Bell@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      Breaking encryption is never something you do for the right reasons.

      Uhhh ransomware?

    • treadful@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      Breaking encryption is never something you do for the right reasons.

      Cracking Enigma was something that needed to been done.

      • GrundlButter@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 months ago

        Kinda drives home another point too. Breaking someone else’s encryption is something you do to enemies. If you’re trying to break my encryption communication or installing a backdoor, you’re an enemy, simple as that.

        My eternal thanks to FOSS, and open encryption standards.

    • RubberDuck@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      I read this the other day… the issue they face is on the warrant side, cross border investigations have a 120 day lead time. So instead of actually integrating police and making sure time sensitive investigations get treated as such… They whine about PET.

      EuroPol seems to be something like the FBI… who operate across all US states. But in the EU the countries are still very separate and require such ridiculous things as proof and due process. And that’s fine… It just needs to be sped up.

      • sunbeam60@lemmy.one
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 months ago

        Europol is merely a clearing house, standards process and coordinating agency for how national police forces work together across the EU states. It has very, very little power. Unfortunately.

          • sunbeam60@lemmy.one
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            4 months ago

            You’re assuming the national services are better, I suppose. In my experience it’s been the EU who has struck a better balance between privacy and investigative powers than the crap they’re pushing for nationally.

  • Grass@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 months ago

    man, I do my homelab for hobby and better performance. this is bonus.

    disclaimer: didn’t read the article past the paywall fade out. and I’m too lazy to circumvent

      • Grass@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 months ago

        you mean like ipsec or vpn? I have been playing with that too for connecting my brother’s computers to my self host services.