• portuga@lemmy.world
    0·
    3 days ago

    Now really, how does one do that? No idea but I’d like to support the little I can. And what instance needs it most?

  • Allero@lemmy.today
    0·
    3 days ago

    My admin flat out refuses to add any donation options, citing he has enough money to maintain the instance as a hobby project. Nice!

        • frankenswine@lemmy.world
          0·
          3 days ago

          you miss the point: instance owners have quite a lot more information on their user’s activities than what’s public.

          or would you argue that reddit does not aggregate data because it’s all public?

          • Saik0@lemmy.saik0.comEnglish
            0·
            3 days ago

            instance owners have quite a lot more information on their user’s activities

            Not really. Only thing additional that could be identified is browsing patterns while on the site itself. I don’t think it’s that valuable. You likely already gave up what you’re likely to see by commenting in communities. That’s going to be tracked best through a proxy or something, not lemmy itself. And can even be tracked externally through other means. Ex: This post has a tracking image on it and because you need to connect to me to load it I now see everyone that had loaded this comment. So this can be done externally without even being an instance owner. Click view source to see it at the end of the post.

            Votes are federated, kbin instances see them as “likes” publicly. Messages are federated, sent in clear text. And posts that are loaded can be tracked via other means… Think of sites that display ads… They do this exact thing and collect information by the boatload because they can inject on every page that shows an ad. Without needing to be an admin on the site itself.

            • Dave@lemmy.nz
              0·
              3 days ago

              In a recent Lemmy version they added support for proxying images. So for people worried about this, see if you can find an instance (or set up your own) that does image proxying.

              Before you ask, I’m not aware of any but I’m sure there are some.

              • Saik0@lemmy.saik0.comEnglish
                0·
                3 days ago

                Yeah that was 19.4. It’s doesn’t proxy everything unless explicitly set to. Just thumbnails I believe. But I could be wrong. And many instance owners would be allergic to that as it leaves them on the hook for storing content. For example… someone posts CSAM… a copy of that is now on your server. You get police raided and you’re fucked.

                https://github.com/LemmyNet/lemmy/blob/705e86eb4c0079d0775f0c1490968f1183095fcc/config/defaults.hjson#L51

                Actually going over it briefly looks like it has a few available options for what it will cache…

                I refuse to enable it myself for the above reason. I would venture 99% of instances out there would also refuse for liability and bandwidth costs.

                • Dave@lemmy.nz
                  0·
                  3 days ago

                  Certain (but not all) thumbnails have been sort of proxied for a while, but it’s complicated. But for example if someone posts a link to some questionable content on imgur, your instance will have a copy of that cached (and never delete it, because… Lemmy reasons). The recent changes just mean you can now enable other images to be proxied, though this is disabled by default. This proxy has an age (a day or a week or whatever you set) and content is deleted if it hasn’t been accessed in that timeframe - this is in contract to the normal Lemmy image stuff that I believe still stays forever unless that was fixed recenty.

                  And many instance owners would be allergic to that as it leaves them on the hook for storing content

                  This is already a risk whether via the existing thumbnail storage or via user uploads. It’s a pretty common recommendation that you should never host a website like Lemmy on a home server, always use a VPS for this reason. Then make sure you understand your local laws as well.

            • frankenswine@lemmy.world
              0·
              3 days ago

              you are (still) missing my point - but i might be wrong as well (i am mot too familiar with ActivityPub).

              my point is not that my public posts are in fact public and can be (and probably are) mined through unknown parties, but that instance owners have even more, probably more valuable info, like IP addresses from which not just geolocation but also wake times, device usage patterns and other gnarly stuff could be extracted, that could - together with other personalized surveillance info (like the usual adware stuff) - be aggregated to give a bigger picture.

              just showing (as you did) that one can get some info about me through my (public) actions does not refute the point that instance owners have access to more, not-so-public information

              • Saik0@lemmy.saik0.comEnglish
                0·
                3 days ago

                but that instance owners have even more, probably more valuable info, like IP addresses from which not just geolocation but also wake times, device usage patterns and other gnarly stuff could be extracted, that could - together with other personalized surveillance info (like the usual adware stuff) - be aggregated to give a bigger picture.

                I have IP behind the geolocation. How do you think that I know the geolocation? It’s an IP lookup. My interface that I shown in the image just doesn’t publish it because I don’t care personally. What I use that service for is simply to track where sensitive emails/documents go. Not to track lemmy. I don’t need specific resolutions. Just to know if they leak outside of what I expected.

                Device patterns? The app you use is the app you use. That would be given away via your browser header. I also collect that with the tracking image. Just once again. Not shown in the graph cause I don’t care to track it personally (I’m only doing this as an example, not to actually aggregate data).

                If you use lemmy over the web browser, browsers don’t really give up that much information unless you’re google themselves. In which case apparently chrome gives up a boatload of information to google’s domains.

                not-so-public information

                You’d have to give me an example of any of what you’re referencing. I can collect IP, web headers, access times, and if I tag enough pages or mark the image as non-cacheable could even see multiple views/accesses (you see views higher than actual visitors) I can track your movement across all of the fediverse.

                that one can get some info about me through my (public) actions

                Simply “viewing” the page (which pulls the image and is not necessarily “public”) is a direct rebuttal to obtaining data that isn’t “public”.

    • shaserlark@sh.itjust.works
      0·
      3 days ago

      Maybe he’s selling our data? Alternatively he’s an altruist but not the GTA V kind of altruist but an actual one? Either way, seems like the best we can do to support him is post as much as we can, even if that means losing our jobs and partners. After all, we don’t need to donate money to him so we don’t actually need any

    • Kalcifer@sh.itjust.works
      0·
      3 days ago

      […] I do wonder if he counts it as advertising for his business […]

      Out of curiosity, what’s the business?

      • AlligatorBlizzard@sh.itjust.works
        0·
        3 days ago

        Not actually sure anymore, he had the domain of itjust.works for some kind of IT business, but now it just redirects to sh.itjust.works. That’s odd.