Long-term carrier lock-in could soon be a thing of the past in America after the FCC proposed requiring telcos to unlock cellphones from their networks 60 days after activation.

FCC boss Jessica Rosenworcel put out that proposal on Thursday, saying it would encourage competition between carriers. If subscribers could simply walk off to another telco with their handsets after two months of use, networks would have to do a lot more competing, the FCC reasons.

“When you buy a phone, you should have the freedom to decide when to change service to the carrier you want and not have the device you own stuck by practices that prevent you from making that choice,” Rosenworcel said.

Carrier-locked devices contain software mechanisms that prevent them from being used on other providers’ networks. The practice has long been criticized for being anti-consumer.

    • ColeSloth@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      In the US, almost no one buys their phones outright. They “lease to own”. Anyone whe does buy their phone outright can just buy the unlocked ones.

      So I’m not sure what this rule would actually change. You’re already not Carrier locked if you bought your phone. You’re only Carrier locked if you lease it.

      The big fuck up was eliminating competition by allowing t mobile to buy sprint. Too many pieces of shit were in charge 2016 to 2020.

      • RaoulDook@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 months ago

        I know lots of Americans who buy their phones without those stupid contracts. It’s not uncommon at all. I have never have a phone on a contract.

        • fishos@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          4 months ago

          So then you buy the unlocked version, just like the person said. This applies more to people leasing it who are locked in, like they said. Do you not have any reading comprehension?

        • ColeSloth@discuss.tchncs.de
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          4 months ago

          I’ve had a couple. The issue is that you don’t save any money on their service if you have your own. So it’s basically “you can pay us $70 a month and buy your phone yourself, or you can pay us $70 a month and have this phone under contract for two years that we’ll give you.”

          • Tygr@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            4 months ago

            Never heard of an MVNO huh? I bought my phones outright and have enjoyed having 4 lines for $105/mo.

              • Tygr@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                4 months ago

                Strangely, if I see internet deprioritized on 5G (which is rare), I switch my settings to 4G and it’s blazing fast. So I’ve never had a problem.

        • Thetimefarm@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          4 months ago

          I’m the only person I know who buys their phones unlocked. I think a lot of people rely on the store where they buy the phone to set it up and get all their stuff transfered over. Just getting a new phone in the mail is a recipe for disaster for like a solid 60% of the US population.

          • kbotc@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            4 months ago

            I’m getting my phone on a loan at 0%. If I want to switch carriers, then I’ll pay off the rest of the cost of my phone and they unlock it for me, but considering we’ve been running rather insane inflation over the last few years, I’m glad I made AT&T pick up that tab. I see no point in buying outright as I’m not changing carriers multiple times in a year.

            • locuester@lemmy.zip
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              edit-2
              4 months ago

              You should really check out an MVNO if you can afford to pay off your phone. You’ll save a LOT. I personally use Helium Mobile (uses Tmo and consumer decentralized network) but there are MVNOs that use AT&T if you prefer their coverage.

              The major carriers overcharge for service since they lock people in with 0% financing.

    • NewWorldOverHere@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      4 months ago

      Europe (Germany specifically) has their own problems with carriers though.

      When you notify them that you’re cancelling your service, you still have to pay for 3 MORE full months of service after that. Even if you’re in the military and ordered to move. That’s a long time.

      This 3 month period mandatory cancellation notice doesn’t change even if you’ve been with them for 2+ years.

      For US carriers, once you’ve been with them more than the initial 2 years, you are pretty much able to cancel whenever.

      • newH0pe@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 months ago

        We’ll that’s not correct anymore. After at most 2 years (depending on the contract) you can cancel every month. It’s the law since I think last year.

      • BigFatNips@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 months ago

        …on OEM unlocked devices that you buy upfront and pay full price for. Buy one second hand? Fuck you. Get one through a carrier? Fuck you. Get a gift from a family member who has upgraded? You guessed it, fuck you.