• bruhSoulz@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    21 hours ago

    This sux big time, been using grayjay and it seems to be working alright thus far

  • Psythik@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 day ago

    Is this the reason why SmartTubeNext keeps breaking on my TV? The updates come pretty quickly but it’s getting annoying cause my $1800 OLED has the processing power of a $50 Chinese Android phone and thus takes forever to install updates.

  • foremanguy@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 day ago

    We need to slowdown YouTube and get an alternative that is viable for people and creators. The problem in this case is creators and brands, almost no creators would continue doing videos if there’s no money at the end

    • sentientity@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      23 hours ago

      It’s subscription based, but Nebula is creator owned I believe. Sucks though that everything free gets acquired by some extractive company.

    • Blackmist@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 day ago

      The problem with money being involved is it’s an invitation to spam crap everywhere.

      One of my relatives has recently taken up “AI travel videos” and “AI cute videos” as a “hobby”. No doubt based on the first thing that came up when I searched for those things, a video titled “make $10,000 a month spamming up YouTube with your AI slop”.

      Oh, and it needs you to buy the AI slop generating tools that they happen to sell. How convenient!

      I mean, this also happened with broadcast TV, where we suddenly went from like 4 channels filled with programs and things competing for space, to 200 channels, where the rush was on to fill the gaps between the adverts as cheaply as possible with reality show tat. And that’s all YouTube is now.

      • Teils13@lemmy.eco.br
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        18 hours ago

        VK Video is indeed probably close to it, being a quasi state company. Theoretically they can not maximize profit extraction in all spaces, and keep the videos without unlimited propaganda. But Rutube is a profit-seeking company that is just smaller scale youtube. Let’s see how the 1st will evolve over time.

    • x00za@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 day ago

      Odysee is actually doing amazing. The interface is great and the speed is even better than Youtube at the moment.

      They are however swithing their core structure from one blockchain powered storage model to another one, so at the moment it’s a bit guesswork and could possibly turn out very bad. (ArWeave bought them…)

      Regarding the far right content on the platform; yes, there is a bit of it, but I have only once come across it, and I was actually browsing some categories relating to politics. So in normal usage, following content creators and checking what Odysee is featuring, you’ll not come across them. But even if you do, Odysee’s block/mute functionality works better than the one on YouTube.

          • 0x0@infosec.pub
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            edit-2
            15 hours ago

            Sure, but that doesn’t mean that one should willfully fraternize with idiots lol Troglodytes should be shunned, nothing wrong about that.

          • 0x0@infosec.pub
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            edit-2
            15 hours ago

            See that’s the cute thing.They can have their free speech right there, but freedom also means the for most people obvious choice not to associate with nazis and other similiar troglodytes.

            And as you said yourself, it already seems to be a popular hole for said miscreants, so why even bother with it.

            • x00za@lemmy.dbzer0.com
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              12 hours ago

              As I said, you don’t even notice them except if you look for them.

              Odysee also has very good block/muting, much better than that of YouTube.

    • linearchaos@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 day ago

      We probably need to have some kind of business that links up people looking for ads with in video monetization. Of course sponsor block Will negate that to some decent extent.

    • Daemon Silverstein@thelemmy.club
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 day ago

      yt-dlp is only affected when YT changes their algorithms (breaking yt-dlp data scrapping capabilities) or when it’s used frequently with the same IP address (leading to automatic IP blockage). If you’re using yt-dlp sporadically, it shouldn’t be affected.

    • CH3DD4R_G0B-L1N@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 day ago

      Is there a gui interface for that anywhere? I really can’t be bothered to learn the command line just to download a couple vids here and there. Especially when freetube still works for now. But if the barrier to entry was a little lower, I’d start backing up faves.

  • where_am_i@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 days ago

    The other day someone on lemmy kept trying to tell me that if google wanted to shut down ad blocking they would. But they don’t, so it’s ok.

    Lol, spawn me that person plz.

    • FartsWithAnAccent@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      AdBlocking is 100% OK, that part is correct for sure. Ad networks (including Google’s) routinely serve up scams and malware: It is foolish not to use a browser with a fully functional ad blocker at this point (i.e. avoid Chrome, use Firefox with uBlock origin).

      As for whether Google approves: Fuck Google! They have been serving up malware and scams in their ads. Their opinion should be irrelevant if you have any interest in protecting yourself, they have repeatedly proven they cannot and should not be trusted.

      • chiliedogg@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        20 hours ago

        If Google takes money to host an ad that’s malware, they should be able to be prosecuted for it.

        This is different than simply hosting community content that they can’t reasonably moderate. They’re being given money to distribute these ads, so they can afford to moderate them.

        Which should be easy anyway. Ads shouldn’t be able to install third-party shit from the advertisers on user computers. Google can easily restrict what can be included on an ad package.

      • Rider@eviltoast.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 day ago

        Yes at this point why would any person would care what Google thinks? Google can go fuck themselves.

    • Daemon Silverstein@thelemmy.club
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 day ago

      It still lasts because there’s no easy way YT can offer their own content without the video being available as a file stream (through CDNs at googlevideos subdomains). If they centralize everything to a single, controlled domain (so to allow things as one-time HTTPS request, better session checking and so on), they’d lost the capability of load balancing allowed by the decentralized nature of CDNs. YouTube downloaders (and, by extension, third-party YT frontends such as Invidious) exploit this CDN aspect to download the videos.

      It’s common to see Invidious instances momentarily blocked. The blockage can’t last forever for two reasons: firstly, IPs (especially IPv4) changes due to how ISPs offer IPv4 addresses through CGNAT, so the instance IPv4 (generally domestic servers) will eventually change (often to a completely different IPv4 range) and YouTube won’t know that the new IP is a former “offender”. Secondly, as IPv4s works through CGNAT, Google can’t keep the bans forever because this IPv4 will be eventually rotated to another client from ISP that’s completely unrelated and unaware of how their IPv4 was a former address for a downloader. It’s like how Signal/WhatsApp/Telegram/Facebook/phone-required services can’t really keep a permanent ban for a specific prepaid number (especially on countries like Brazil, where ANATEL allows for phone number rotation when the mobile plan is cancelled), because the number will be potentially owned by another person with nothing to do with the former owner.

      So, in summary, Google can either end with YouTube CDNs (ditching their load balancing), or they can try to implement an innovative way to keep load balancing while serving the request one-time only, or they won’t be able to do nothing but to perpetually catch themselves drying ice cubes.

        • Daemon Silverstein@thelemmy.club
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 day ago

          I guess they have no decentralized CDNs as YouTube does, but… paid streaming services still have their weaknesses (there certainly are tools that fetches content from there because of, e.g: entire Netflix movies/series became torrents without screen recording).

        • towerful@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 day ago

          The financial insensitive to ensure only paying users can access the content offsets the cost of the different infrastructure.

          YouTube needs to make money as cheaply as possible. They can’t afford the processing to guarantee ad delivery and secure content like that.

          If the infrastructure/delivery cost of securing content goes up, streaming services can raise their prices.
          YT can’t really serve more ads. The platform is already pretty packed with ads

          • jj4211@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            19 hours ago

            YT can’t really serve more ads

            They say to hold their beer and watch this…

        • hangonasecond@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 day ago

          Not the OP, and I don’t actually know, but paid streaming services differ from YouTube in that everyone who accesses the content is paying for the service. On one hand, you can validate that everytime a video is served, it’s served to a paying user. On the other, you are receiving revenue directly from consumers to fund the infrastructure to store and serve the videos.

          YouTube, on the other hand, stores significantly more content, for free, and can be accessed for free, without being signed in.

          • nafzib@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            21 hours ago

            The “without being signed in” part of YouTube is now no longer completely true. I tried to watch a video tutorial at work the other day and it wouldn’t play because I wasn’t signed in and so “they couldn’t be sure I wasn’t a bot”. I’m not signing into any personal stuff on my work computer, or wasting time creating a “work” Google account, so I guess YT can no longer be a place where I can get helpful programming info.

          • x00za@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 day ago

            You are spot on. The CDN simply has authentication functionality. (Or the app generates a temporary CDN URL that you’ll use)

  • Altima NEO@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 days ago

    I’ve noticed a few people on Reddit taking about getting possibly shadow banned on YouTube, myself included. With no real explanation why? Every video just comes up as “content not available” when logged in. It started a week ago or so. I wonder if this is all related?

  • arthurpizza@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 days ago

    I’m a YouTube creator, part of the partner program, and I also manually upload to TILvids. The videos I make generate about $100-$300 a year through the partner program, so I’m not a professional by any means. It feels like they’re trying to keep creators from leaving by putting up small roadblocks that limit our reach beyond the platform. Given PeerTube’s non-profit model, I see it as a potential future for content sharing. Though there are a few rock stars on YouTube, most of the creators on that platform make little to no money from publishing videos. There are more people like me than Linus Media Group.

    • ripcord@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 days ago

      I would guess a significant number of “creators” are motivated by the idea of eventually becoming a hit and making much more money, though. And wouldn’t really do it of they didn’t have that dream.

      Not sure what percentage, though. Maybe less than I think.

    • mesamune@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 days ago

      Yeah its really too bad how Youtube treats other video creators. Its a strange world. Hopefully peertube (given enough time) will have some viable options or at least an alternative. Is there any other platforms that work with video creators like yourself? I personally dont know of too many other than maybe twitch? I haven’t been keeping up.

  • General_Effort@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 days ago

    Hmm. Per Facebook v. Power Ventures, it could be a (criminal) violation of the CFAA to “circumvent” IP blocks.

  • anticurrent@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 days ago

    I took full advantage of invidious while it was still working, now I am anxious of ever going back to YouTube. It won’t be long before they requiring giving them your iris scan before watching a video on that shit platform.

  • IsThisAnAI@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 days ago

    “Google shouldn’t be allowed to operate as a loss leader” - Reddit and Lemmy

    “Paying for the service? Fuck that” - Also lemmy and Reddit.

    • takeda@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      Amazing. As if these communities are made with thousands of people having different opinions.

      And here’s mine: since Google used their position to essentially destroy any competition in this area, why should be my duty to protect their revenue? Even if I can afford to pay their services, I won’t and will actively discourage anyone else from doing so, by installing uBlock, ReVanced, NewPipe, SmartTube, GrayJay etc.

      • mriormro@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 day ago

        It’s not your duty at all but it’s funny when you guys bitch about it with such fervor. It comes off as incredibly entitled.

      • IsThisAnAI@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 days ago

        You can have a diverse community that has a large majority opinion. And what I said is certainly the prevailing opinion.

        And to answer you about your personal view: You are stealing the right to distribution and taking money away from both corporations but more importantly creators. And I’ve seen the rates of direct donations eg patrons . It’s not ideological for most people, it’s about getting content for free.

        Are you donating to every channel you are watching? I doubt it. Even the people who care mostly only donate directly to one of two top patrons, while still consuming many many more.

        If you are actually donating, then good for you, I congratulate you for living what you preach and have zero qualms. But you would be a statistical edge case.

      • IsThisAnAI@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        2 days ago

        Because you have not set up that agreement and the vast majority of people don’t pay outside of ads or a singular monthly sub.

        The next best thing is nebula which has 600,000 monthly subs at $5. Which means a maximum payout pool of 18M a year.

        Look at the number of users vs donations. The only reason this place works is low traffic and low bandwidth. The vision you describe would be great but it’s not going to happen. ESPECIALLY once users are forced to pay rather than getting shit for free.

        • magic_smoke@links.hackliberty.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 days ago

          You don’t need all, or even most users money. Plenty of people make enough money off of the portion of their fanbase that pays them to not only survive, but thrive and grow.

          You don’t need all, or even most. You don’t need this to be the norm for it to be sustainable.

          • IsThisAnAI@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            2 days ago

            Oh right, in the magical world where people are giving their money away. The majority of content creators would of left your platform. But it’s okay it’s easy to steal their right to distribution and handwave it away as not a problem.

            • magic_smoke@links.hackliberty.org
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              edit-2
              2 days ago

              This isn’t some magical world, this is how most open source software projects and even online content creators make their money.

              Creators make way fucking more from patron than AdSense, even if its only a percentage of their audience. Do you know how much fucking watch time it would take to match the $5 a month I give to several of my favorite producers of online video?

              A lot more than either your or I have time for, certainly more than the content they create.

              You need only a sliver of your audience to pay, and platforms like patron prove this works.

              The fact you’re baffled by even a small percentage of people donating to gratis projects says a lot about how you value volunteer labor, and its pretty fucking sad.

              • IsThisAnAI@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                2 days ago

                The large majority of open source tools that are used in mass have significant commercial backing.

                Yes many users could make more money from patron only. Very few do in the tall world. Their primary source of income is YT. Because people don’t use the patrons.

                • magic_smoke@links.hackliberty.org
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  2 days ago

                  What are you fucking on about lmao? Most channels that run a patreon, use it as their main source of income unless they also sell merch.

                  Everyone from giant channels like Linus Media Group, to medium and small-sized ones like Technology Connections, and Cathode Ray Dude.

                  I mean pretty much everyone I watch that has talked financials has mentioned how important patron is.

                  Some of them like Botgrinder literally for the most part, only make money through patreon because of YT’s restrictive demonetization guidelines. Yet despite the lack of ad-revenue the guy is able to live off of a 50k sub channel where he pretty much smokes weed and flies FPV quads.

                  As for FLOSS, that heavily depends the projects. Huge ones used by corporations sure, but who’s footing the bill for newpipe, Yt-dlp, Jellyfin, Pihole, And pretty much every video game emulator ever written? People like you (probably not considering your attitude), and me.

  • CosmicTurtle0@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 days ago

    I wonder if these services are on small cloud providers. If so then they can just block their entire CIDR.

    I wonder if they were to move to GPC if they would have better luck.

    • mesamune@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 days ago

      Im seeing it from a residential IP. I think its more they have an allowlist rather than a blocklist nowadays. But I can only speculate. Piped stopped working a month or so ago on my personal instance and updates dont fix it. I can imagine for video uploaders, the issue is worse.

    • MigratingtoLemmy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 days ago

      YouTube and my existing Gmail is the only thing tying me back. And the occasional Google maps. I don’t even use the rest of their services anymore

      • Preflight_Tomato@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        15 hours ago
        • gmail you can forward all mail to another account.
        • Youtube, you could try following your subscriptions via RSS/ATOM feed reader. It’s honestly just like regular YT but without the recommendation engine.
        • MigratingtoLemmy@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          11 hours ago

          The point is not to use Gmail at all, and forwarding it isn’t likely to help (this is in important places like work)

          It’s about the YouTube platform. For the most part I don’t pay attention to the recommendations

      • ludicolo@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        2 days ago

        highly reccomend Grayjay and Freetube. Futo claims to be foss but it is only source viewable (my apologies having a brain fart and cannot remember the actual term.) which to my knowledge means you can see the source code but not redistribute it. They ask for a one time $10 payment but the app functions the exact same with or without payment. Grayjay does not have a desktop application but they are looking for someone with experience to develop one. Freetube is open source and contains extra addons like de arrow and watching from invidious instances along with a desktop and mobile application. It’s UI is less appealing than Grayjay ( at least personally) but it’s the only way I watch youtube on PC now and I use Grayjay on mobile. Both of these contain sponsorblock too! ;)

        If you watch YouTube on an android TV you can sideload smart tube TV, which is ad free as well. While I personally don’t reccomend it you can sign in with your yt account on both grayjay and smart tube to impket subscriptions.

        If you are looking for a solution for YouTube TV… Well… You may need to sail the 7 seas and live with not watching live (unless others have a solution for this.

        Fuck Google.

      • melroy@kbin.melroy.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 days ago

        THat sounds great! Gmail can be easily replaced, by like Proton mail or something… Youtube is also very hard… It’s a vicious circle, “Youtubers” try to host their content elsewhere but nobody is looking. While some users also want to get rid of the youtube platform, but since most people are still and keep watching on YouTube, the content creators keep uploading there…

        • dan@upvote.au
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          2 days ago

          Gmail can be easily replaced, by like Proton mail or something

          Except for the fact that you’ll need to update your email address in so many places.

          If you do move to a different provider, make sure you use your own domain. It’s way more professional, and it lets you move to a different provider in the future without having to change your email address again. I’ve had one of my email addresses for a bit over 20 years across a bunch of different providers.

          The paid version of Protonmail lets you have up to 3 custom domains. MXRoute and FastMail let you use your own domain too. MXRoute supports unlimited domains and addresses; you’re just limited by total disk space.

          If the email address is important to you, it’s better to use a paid service since it’ll usually give you proper support and an SLA.

          • ayaya@lemdro.id
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            edit-2
            2 days ago

            +1 for MXroute. I have unlimited domains with 25GB of storage for $30 every 3 years. So less than a dollar per month. Looks like they are still offering it. It’s more than enough for email especially considering the Gmail account I used for 15 years was under 5GB.

            I switched to them at the beginning of the year so about 9 months ago and have not had any issues.

            • dan@upvote.au
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              2 days ago

              MXroute are great. I switched to self-hosting my email server using Mailcow a few years ago, but still use MXroute for outbound email (meaning my SMTP server relays outbound email via MXroute). They’ve got deliverability figured out and have several fallbacks - I think if all of their outbound servers fail to send the email, they retry via Mailbaby and Mailchannels.

          • melroy@kbin.melroy.org
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            2 days ago

            Agreed, if you can effort is, buy a domain and use it for email. I also have melroy at melroy dot o r g. However, I still redirect my mail, since I don’t like paying for services haha. That being said, I’m planning to setup my own mail server (I finally now have the infrastructure at home and static IP, needed for this).

            Anyhow, DNS also needs to be replaced by something better.

            • dan@upvote.au
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              edit-2
              2 days ago

              Forwarding is a decent approach too. Just note that it’s not 100% reliable (due to limitations around spam filtering) and you will sometimes have emails that get dropped.

          • melroy@kbin.melroy.org
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            2 days ago

            It’s still youtube… And if you talk about Tor, the Tor network is not gonna like this kind of traffic. Video streams are too heavy for the Tor network. Maybe I2Pnet… But again, it’s still Google YouTube.

      • melroy@kbin.melroy.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 days ago

        I agree. But to be very honest, de-googling is very important but not always very easy. So I did personally move away already from Gmail. I also now host my own Nextcloud instance, which I use for my agenda as well as contacts. Meaning I also don’t sync or store contacts or anything in Google. I don’t use any cloud services for storage either, again Nextcloud (self hosted) solved that for me.

        Then I was never using ChromeOS, so that helps, I’m only using Linux. However, I do have an Android device. It’s really hard to get rid of that, maybe a custom ROM, is that valid? Anyhow, and last but not least Google search, Google images, Google maps, etc. I don’t want to go from Google Search to another big Microsoft corp, so moving to Bing is a no go. That also means all those meta search engines is also not a good alternative, which includes: DuckDuckGo, ecosia and alike… Qitchain, presearch or Yacy isn’t working for me either. It’s just not good enough.

        Thus finding a good search alternative is hard! I’m actually considering as a software engineer to build my own.