Oh no, not just my build server, Microsofts build server… Everyones’ Azure build server - (if you’re building on windows)

  • Trigger2_2000@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 days ago

    If I have a nickel for everytime someone said “The cloud never goes down”.

    I’d have a lot of nickels and would spend my time doing something I like a lot more than working 🤑.

  • blindbunny@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 days ago

    I swear to the gods, proprietary software is going to be the end of civilization…

    • Lowpast@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 days ago

      For using msbuild or vsbuild to build C projects.

      Can be installed standalone but it’s typically just easier to install the full VS suite because on a shared runner it’s better to include the entire kitchen.

          • jaybone@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            5 days ago

            Maven works without an IDE. (And so does ant if you’re going back that far.)

            And really early Java we used Makefiles.

            Anyway all of that worked without an IDE.

  • cheddar@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 days ago

    I’m not familiar with the service, can someone explain? Like, are all pipelines on Azure affected? Or is it some internal stuff where a company relying on paid tech forgot to pay for it?

    • RonSijm@programming.devOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 days ago

      No, not some internal company, just Microsoft being Microsoft. So all Windows pipelines. They also have Linux based pipelines so not completely all pipelines.

      But given that a lot of people build dotnet stuff on Azure, the ‘windows-latest’ image is usually the default. So a lot of pipelines

  • AreaKode@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 days ago

    As a sysadmin, fuck certificates. They are the bane of my existence. I vote we abolish certs and go Irish honor system!

    • PlexSheep@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 days ago

      Are you talking licenses or certificates? Because if certificates are not automated that’s not a problem with certificates but with administration.

    • Bappity@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      5 days ago

      certificates fucking destroy everything in my work for an hour once every year because of expiry

      • skuzz@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        5 days ago

        Certs have existed a long time, are never implemented correctly, and the expiration cycle that is supposed to bolster security just causes pain as a result.

        Certs should just be redesigned to have a kill switch. CRLs were supposed to handle that, but are rarely implemented or implemented correctly.

        Certs are also used in so many places where they may not be suited to the task, but because they exist, they’ve become the de-facto standard.

        A temporal expiration system seems flawed from the beginning anyway. What, you don’t trust your system anymore just because time has passed? Time is always passing. Are we all secretly racist against clocks now?

      • lud@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        5 days ago

        You are supposed to be tracking when they expire and then renew/replace them before they expire.

        • MajorHavoc@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          5 days ago

          You are supposed to be tracking when they expire and then renew/replace them before they expire.

          I’ve been told that, as well, but I’m not sure I see it… Seems like a lot of effort… (This is sarcasm. Or is it just too much honesty?)

  • Jocker@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 days ago

    Microsoft Hosted Agents have an expired Visual Studio license.

    Is it like, Microsoft has to renew licence with Microsoft?

    Or are they pushing for an upgrade?

    • jdeath@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 days ago

      i imagine MS just hard coded a random license key into the build image and it expired. the issue doesn’t say exactly tho

      • IsThisAnAI@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        5 days ago

        🤷‍♂️ run your own 4 nines service to complete. Nothing is preventing you. People choose this shit because running services is hard and expensive.

    • Flipper@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 days ago

      There are companies selling a relabeled GCC with the O flags behind the license check.

    • BradleyUffner@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      5 days ago

      It’s not using just the compiler. This agent is configured to use the full version of Visual Studio for some reason, and building through that, which requires a license. You can build via the msbuild system, which doesn’t require a license.

      • adhocfungus@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 days ago

        It gets worse if you use Microsoft D365 AX products. Then you have to provision an entire Build server for builds which has to run Visual Studio 2019 on Windows 10. To do a build you run a pipeline in Azure DevOps, which runs the compiler in a full Visual Studio 2019 environment, which has to run on a special Azure virtual environment running Windows 10 hosted by Microsoft. It’s so fragile.

      • skulbuny@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        5 days ago

        People forget that compilers used to be commonly proprietary and commercially licensed. Heck, I’m born on the 90s and knew that 😂

        So so glad free and open source software took over though

      • Todd Bonzalez@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        6 days ago

        Imagine paying money for software designed to sabotage your business if you miss a license payment.

      • palordrolap@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        6 days ago

        How about, I don’t know, not yanking the cord (or setting things up so the cord is yanked automatically) and pursuing the payment later?

        But then that could mean that someone might - even temporarily - get something for nothing, and they can’t be seen to promote anything even remotely similar to that.

        Perhaps this tiny company are so close to the knife edge that they can’t afford to allow it to happen. Must have constant revenue stream or else close up sho… wait, Micro-who?

  • Bappity@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    6 days ago

    I don’t get the appeal of azure because of things like this.

    annoying how much they try to push it

    • tiny@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      6 days ago

      If you look at it as generic could provider it’s not good, but if you look at it as making m$ run they’re software instead of you it’s awesome because most m$ software is not fun to run

    • qaz@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      6 days ago

      The company I work for loves Azure. If it’s not available as an Azure service it won’t be used (except for uptime kuma). Some time ago there was a global Azure outage and we could do literally nothing.

      • Odinkirk@lemmygrad.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        5 days ago

        If it’s not available as an Azure service it won’t be used (except for uptime kuma).

        What Clive Barker movie do you live in?

    • slazer2au@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      6 days ago

      Moving to the cloud is a business decision not a technical one.

      Csuite sees us spending Capex 200K on a server or 2 and several thousand opex per year to maintain it.

      Cloud takes that 200K Capex and move it to Opex with significant markup markup.

      From a technical pov we st it as a waste but business will business itself into cost overruns

      • DudeDudenson@lemmings.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        6 days ago

        But they promised we could save a ton of money with their monitoring dashboards we won’t look at until suddenly we get a bill that is 5x what they promised!

        • JerkyChew@lemmy.one
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          5 days ago

          Lifting and shifting an existing monolithic architecture to the cloud with zero modernization changes will result in a higher cost than leaving it in a data center.

          Converting the application to use as much serverless and microservice-based technology as possible is where the cloud ROI is.

          • jaybone@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            5 days ago

            For a lot of things, that means pretty much re-architecting and re-coding an entire application / system pretty much from scratch.