Oh no, not just my build server, Microsofts build server… Everyones’ Azure build server - (if you’re building on windows)

  • cheddar@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 months ago

    I’m not familiar with the service, can someone explain? Like, are all pipelines on Azure affected? Or is it some internal stuff where a company relying on paid tech forgot to pay for it?

    • RonSijm@programming.devOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      No, not some internal company, just Microsoft being Microsoft. So all Windows pipelines. They also have Linux based pipelines so not completely all pipelines.

      But given that a lot of people build dotnet stuff on Azure, the ‘windows-latest’ image is usually the default. So a lot of pipelines

  • blindbunny@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 months ago

    I swear to the gods, proprietary software is going to be the end of civilization…

  • Jocker@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 months ago

    Microsoft Hosted Agents have an expired Visual Studio license.

    Is it like, Microsoft has to renew licence with Microsoft?

    Or are they pushing for an upgrade?

    • jdeath@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      i imagine MS just hard coded a random license key into the build image and it expired. the issue doesn’t say exactly tho

  • Bappity@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 months ago

    I don’t get the appeal of azure because of things like this.

    annoying how much they try to push it

    • slazer2au@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      Moving to the cloud is a business decision not a technical one.

      Csuite sees us spending Capex 200K on a server or 2 and several thousand opex per year to maintain it.

      Cloud takes that 200K Capex and move it to Opex with significant markup markup.

      From a technical pov we st it as a waste but business will business itself into cost overruns

      • DudeDudenson@lemmings.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        3 months ago

        But they promised we could save a ton of money with their monitoring dashboards we won’t look at until suddenly we get a bill that is 5x what they promised!

        • JerkyChew@lemmy.one
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          3 months ago

          Lifting and shifting an existing monolithic architecture to the cloud with zero modernization changes will result in a higher cost than leaving it in a data center.

          Converting the application to use as much serverless and microservice-based technology as possible is where the cloud ROI is.

          • jaybone@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            3 months ago

            For a lot of things, that means pretty much re-architecting and re-coding an entire application / system pretty much from scratch.

    • qaz@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      The company I work for loves Azure. If it’s not available as an Azure service it won’t be used (except for uptime kuma). Some time ago there was a global Azure outage and we could do literally nothing.

      • Odinkirk@lemmygrad.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        3 months ago

        If it’s not available as an Azure service it won’t be used (except for uptime kuma).

        What Clive Barker movie do you live in?

    • tiny@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      If you look at it as generic could provider it’s not good, but if you look at it as making m$ run they’re software instead of you it’s awesome because most m$ software is not fun to run

  • Trigger2_2000@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 months ago

    If I have a nickel for everytime someone said “The cloud never goes down”.

    I’d have a lot of nickels and would spend my time doing something I like a lot more than working 🤑.

      • palordrolap@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        3 months ago

        How about, I don’t know, not yanking the cord (or setting things up so the cord is yanked automatically) and pursuing the payment later?

        But then that could mean that someone might - even temporarily - get something for nothing, and they can’t be seen to promote anything even remotely similar to that.

        Perhaps this tiny company are so close to the knife edge that they can’t afford to allow it to happen. Must have constant revenue stream or else close up sho… wait, Micro-who?

      • IsThisAnAI@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        3 months ago

        🤷‍♂️ run your own 4 nines service to complete. Nothing is preventing you. People choose this shit because running services is hard and expensive.

  • Dasnap@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 months ago

    I didn’t even know VS Code was something you could pay for.

    Also, are you using Discord bots for work?

      • Lucy :3@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        3 months ago

        Also, VS Code is mid, not even working correctly and definitely not OOB on Linux in my experience, and VS just does not support Linux at all. And is shit anyway.

          • qaz@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            edit-2
            3 months ago

            I still wonder why they decided to write their own UI framework from scratch.

          • Ekky@sopuli.xyz
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            edit-2
            3 months ago

            Hmmm, the front page looks like they’re trying to sell a LLM code generator with additional QOL to businesses, and not a developer focused IDE or extensible text editor.

            Definitely not something that catches my interest as a developer. Though, I haven’t tried it, so these are just initial impressions from reading their landing page.

            • kamenLady.@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              3 months ago

              It’s really good and open source. I used sublime & atom before and it’s pretty much the same experience.

              Is it also because it’s made for mac first?

              • Ekky@sopuli.xyz
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                edit-2
                3 months ago

                Hadn’t actually noticed it was Mac first before you mentioned it, but no, if it works for Mac, then it likely also works for Linux (and that’s what counts, right?).

                Contrary to my previous statement, I’ve actually tried downloading Zed. The first thing I noticed was the “sign in” in the top right corner. Feels rather unsightly, but no biggie. It appears to redirect to GitHub authorization, after which it fails with a “OAuthCallback”-error. Might be my fault, can’t remember if I’ve disabled or limited unnecessary functionality in GitHub.

                The design feels slick and most options are hidden away or represented by only a small icon with tooltips. It appears that no advanced settings page exists, as nearly everything is handled in JSON (initially thought that a visual settings page must have been hidden away deep down somewhere, but that appears to be wrong).

                Coop programming seems to be a big feature, but I’ll skip that as it appears to need setup.

                Also, the LLM part is not nearly as prominent as their front page makes it out to be, rather feels like an option than a prominent or forced feature, so that’s really nice.

                The included extensions (nice to have them as they’re no given) appear to focus on themes and syntax, can’t find any cross-development nor compilation related extensions which is just fine. Compilation is best handled in the terminal anyway.

                Overall it feels pretty solid, definitely different from the first impressions of their page. Might be even better with more diverse extensions, though, I haven’t looked at the internet for unlisted extensions, and I’m not sure how old the project is (the extensions might just not be made yet).

                There’s also no pop-ups, start pages with all kinds of featured content, nor settings or buttons that grab your attention away from your work (except the login button, perhaps. I would like to see what it looks like once logged in).

                I’m probably missing most features as my GitHub integration fails, but I’m overall positively surprised.

                • kamenLady.@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  3 months ago

                  It has an integrated Terminal, which works good - made my work with sass on the server a little easier.

                  Glad you’re linking it. It never stopped to surprise me with it’s simplicity and absence of forced features.

                  Also nightime coding friendly:

                  PS: When logged in - you just see your profile pic at the right top, but i still have to integrate a project - until now i’m nothing more than logged in. I Discovered ZED just a few weeks ago.

        • rtxn@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          3 months ago

          VS’s built-in .NET debugger is top tier, though. Especially the ability to edit code while it is running.

    • Darohan@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      3 months ago

      Visual Studio and VS Code are two separate products, I’m afraid. Visual Studio is a .NET IDE and build tool, as opposed to VS Code which is essentially an extensible text editor.

      Edit: also the screenshot looks like it might be from Slack?

      • magic_lobster_party@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        3 months ago

        The great thing about Slack is how easy it is to make automations. I guess this one just reads RSS feeds.

        At my work we have automations notifying us about production errors for example.

    • Flipper@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      There are companies selling a relabeled GCC with the O flags behind the license check.

    • BradleyUffner@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      3 months ago

      It’s not using just the compiler. This agent is configured to use the full version of Visual Studio for some reason, and building through that, which requires a license. You can build via the msbuild system, which doesn’t require a license.

      • adhocfungus@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        3 months ago

        It gets worse if you use Microsoft D365 AX products. Then you have to provision an entire Build server for builds which has to run Visual Studio 2019 on Windows 10. To do a build you run a pipeline in Azure DevOps, which runs the compiler in a full Visual Studio 2019 environment, which has to run on a special Azure virtual environment running Windows 10 hosted by Microsoft. It’s so fragile.

      • skulbuny@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        3 months ago

        People forget that compilers used to be commonly proprietary and commercially licensed. Heck, I’m born on the 90s and knew that 😂

        So so glad free and open source software took over though

    • Lowpast@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      For using msbuild or vsbuild to build C projects.

      Can be installed standalone but it’s typically just easier to install the full VS suite because on a shared runner it’s better to include the entire kitchen.

          • jaybone@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            3 months ago

            Maven works without an IDE. (And so does ant if you’re going back that far.)

            And really early Java we used Makefiles.

            Anyway all of that worked without an IDE.